US Supreme court Unanimous decision

[Glocktogo]

True, but it must have stuck in their craws to vote down an anti-2A measure, despite the long-term implications.

To be sure, which makes the win that much sweeter.

 

[TedKennedy]

It could've easily been expanded to other items, such as drugs.

Another example of how protecting the "other guys'" freedom is essential to gun owners freedom. I'm still amazed at how many gun owners don't recognize that liberty is liberty, and we need to safeguard it regardless of our opinions on the choices others make.

 

[Cowcatcher]

Another example of how protecting the "other guys'" freedom is essential to gun owners freedom. I'm still amazed at how many gun owners don't recognize that liberty is liberty, and we need to safeguard it regardless of our opinions on the choices others make.

Good point! I’ve noticed myself realizing that over the last couple years.

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

It appears to me that this was a search and seizure issue as opposed to a 2A issue.

It was a step over the line of the Fourth Amendment squarely upon the Second Amendment, and in my view I see it as a violation of the Fifth Amendment's due process requirement. Step on one article in what we call the Bill of Rights and it is likely to involve violation of other articles as well. Our rights are intertwined, our Founding Fathers knew this and encoded those rights in that fashion.

Woody

 

[Hodrod]

I just can't stop smiling....!!!

 

[Glocktogo]

It was a step over the line of the Fourth Amendment squarely upon the Second Amendment, and in my view I see it as a violation of the Fifth Amendment's due process requirement. Step on one article in what we call the Bill of Rights and it is likely to involve violation of other articles as well. Our rights are intertwined, our Founding Fathers knew this and encoded those rights in that fashion.

Woody

It's a quadruple threat in that it violates the 2nd, 4th, 5th and 14th Amendments. They'd have to try VERY hard to violate more of the BoR in one act.

 

[Lightsluvr]

Kagan is not on the court until Breyer retires.

 

[p238shooter]

Wondering how this older past SCOTUS ruling is going to fit with Biden's new RED Flag order just signed?

 

[kingfish]

Kagan is not on the court until Breyer retires.

Not sure what you are thinking about here, but Kagan has been an associate judge on the Supreme Court since August of 2010. Obozo appointed her.

 

[HarryBear]

They are earning their pay.