Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
To disclose or not to disclose
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Slack" data-source="post: 1749749" data-attributes="member: 13947"><p>Wow, David2012, what a jerk. You specifically make inaccurate statements and implied they were law ("...you are only required..."). When corrected you accuse people of "splitting hairs", not using "a little common sense" and getting "into a hissy over every little thing".</p><p></p><p>If you had just suggested your approach as a practical way to stand back from the legal line without going overboard and not as what is "required" then there would be no need to correct your inaccuracies. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okiebryan, thanks for once again specifically pointing out what the law says and not making up something as passing it off as law.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okiebryan, thanks for providing a straight forward method to avoid the ambiguity of certain CCW situations in regards to the law.</p><p></p><p>For everyone that does not want to understand the specifics of the law or try to determine when they apply (not criticizing, I understand) then I suggest you use David2012's method of notifying anytime you are dealing with an officer acting in his official capacity as a LEO. This is a safe and practical way to go. But please don't pass it off to others as "law".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Slack, post: 1749749, member: 13947"] Wow, David2012, what a jerk. You specifically make inaccurate statements and implied they were law ("...you are only required..."). When corrected you accuse people of "splitting hairs", not using "a little common sense" and getting "into a hissy over every little thing". If you had just suggested your approach as a practical way to stand back from the legal line without going overboard and not as what is "required" then there would be no need to correct your inaccuracies. Okiebryan, thanks for once again specifically pointing out what the law says and not making up something as passing it off as law. Okiebryan, thanks for providing a straight forward method to avoid the ambiguity of certain CCW situations in regards to the law. For everyone that does not want to understand the specifics of the law or try to determine when they apply (not criticizing, I understand) then I suggest you use David2012's method of notifying anytime you are dealing with an officer acting in his official capacity as a LEO. This is a safe and practical way to go. But please don't pass it off to others as "law". [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
To disclose or not to disclose
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom