US reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

[streetglideok]

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

Granted, even if the chosen one signs such a treaty, congress must ratify it before it becomes binding, correct?

 

[reddog1]

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

Granted, even if the chosen one signs such a treaty, congress must ratify it before it becomes binding, correct?

Correct.... its a bunch of BS

 

[vvvvvvv]

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

Granted, even if the chosen one signs such a treaty, congress must ratify it before it becomes binding, correct?

And even then, the U.S. Constitution is still superior.

It wouldn't take long to get AT LEAST 30 credible cases filed against the treaty...

 

[henschman]

And then there's always Nullification and Interposition.

 

[vvvvvvv]

And then there's always Nullification and Interposition.

Same things...

Interposition is the action. Nullification is the result.