Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
US Senator Coburn (R-OK) Introduces Gun Control of His Own (not kidding!!!)
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 2174014" data-attributes="member: 7900"><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Dang....those colors are crap to try to read, although your answers are spot on.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Especially that part about claiming that the Constitution is a "living" document. The liberals have been trying to make the argument of the living document aspect for years. With their "interpretations," free peoples would no longer be that.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Instead, we need to be looking at the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence from the standpoint of being "originalists" in the interpretation of them. As a wise man said one time, "Words mean things." To stand beside that comment, I have possession of a Dictionary with a copyright of 1957. It does not have what I would call "politically correct" definitions, nor does it have all the vulgar words that society says we need to include in the dictionary, even though those words are unacceptable in most cases of correspondence.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 2174014, member: 7900"] [FONT=Georgia][SIZE=3]Dang....those colors are crap to try to read, although your answers are spot on. Especially that part about claiming that the Constitution is a "living" document. The liberals have been trying to make the argument of the living document aspect for years. With their "interpretations," free peoples would no longer be that. Instead, we need to be looking at the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence from the standpoint of being "originalists" in the interpretation of them. As a wise man said one time, "Words mean things." To stand beside that comment, I have possession of a Dictionary with a copyright of 1957. It does not have what I would call "politically correct" definitions, nor does it have all the vulgar words that society says we need to include in the dictionary, even though those words are unacceptable in most cases of correspondence. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
US Senator Coburn (R-OK) Introduces Gun Control of His Own (not kidding!!!)
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom