Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
We are our own worst enemy....
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3297980" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>Someone really needs to take the NFA back to the supreme court. The original ruling on the NFA was a farce and everyone knows it. Yet they now site it as precedent when anyone talks about how the NFA infringes on the 2A. It didn't help that the person who originally brought the case to court was a convicted felon turned informant. The first judge ruled in his favor knowing that he would go into hiding after testifying and that he wouldn't show for the SCOTUS hearing. Why no one else has tried to sue over the NFA is beyond me.</p><p></p><p>Right now they rule it as constitutional because Congress has the power to levy taxes. The tax is one thing, the godforsaken wait just to be "vetted" is the part that is unconstitutional.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3297980, member: 43724"] Someone really needs to take the NFA back to the supreme court. The original ruling on the NFA was a farce and everyone knows it. Yet they now site it as precedent when anyone talks about how the NFA infringes on the 2A. It didn't help that the person who originally brought the case to court was a convicted felon turned informant. The first judge ruled in his favor knowing that he would go into hiding after testifying and that he wouldn't show for the SCOTUS hearing. Why no one else has tried to sue over the NFA is beyond me. Right now they rule it as constitutional because Congress has the power to levy taxes. The tax is one thing, the godforsaken wait just to be "vetted" is the part that is unconstitutional. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
We are our own worst enemy....
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom