Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="YukonGlocker" data-source="post: 2873438" data-attributes="member: 425">There it is.&nbsp; Thank you for pointing that out.&nbsp; If the instructors indeed said that, that is an issue I agree with.&nbsp; According to their Facebook clarification, they didn&#039;t say that, and it was a mis-interpretation by the news staff.&nbsp; Two years later, I still can&#039;t get the New York Times to correct their major mis-interpretations of my research, so it happens frequently and is definitely a possibility.&nbsp; That all being said, I can see a possible issue here; and wonder why nobody pointed this out before.&nbsp; I certainly missed it myself. I take up the 2A cause on plenty of lib/progressive sites.&nbsp; I&#039;m not trying to argue here, just understand what the issue was, and you [USER=459]@olyeller[/USER] were the first to point this out.&nbsp; All the folks that were bent out of shape about the &quot;need&quot; usage will be really tied in knots when they discover this.&nbsp; Thanks man!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="YukonGlocker, post: 2873438, member: 425"] There it is. Thank you for pointing that out. If the instructors indeed said that, that is an issue I agree with. According to their Facebook clarification, they didn't say that, and it was a mis-interpretation by the news staff. Two years later, I still can't get the New York Times to correct their major mis-interpretations of my research, so it happens frequently and is definitely a possibility. That all being said, I can see a possible issue here; and wonder why nobody pointed this out before. I certainly missed it myself. I take up the 2A cause on plenty of lib/progressive sites. I'm not trying to argue here, just understand what the issue was, and you [USER=459]@olyeller[/USER] were the first to point this out. All the folks that were bent out of shape about the "need" usage will be really tied in knots when they discover this. Thanks man! [/QUOTE]

Verification