Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What Do You Think About This Mini-Sub deal?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SlugSlinger" data-source="post: 4059768" data-attributes="member: 7248"><p>And the blame game begins.</p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]386817[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><h3>Missing Titanic Sub Once Faced Massive Lawsuit Over Depths It Could Safely Travel To</h3><h3>Court documents reveal a former OceanGate employee had several safety complaints over the tourist submersible—and then he was fired.</h3><p><a href="https://www.okshooters.com/safari-reader%3A//newrepublic.com/authors/daniel-strauss" target="_blank">Daniel Strauss</a>11:59 a.m. ET</p><p></p><p>David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe/Getty Images</p><p></p><p>The tourist submersible that <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/19/us/missing-submarine-titanic-who-is-on.html" target="_blank">went missing</a>while exploring the <em>Titanic</em> wreck was previously the target of safety complaints from an employee of OceanGate, the parent company that owns the sub and runs tourist expeditions of the wreck. That employee complained specifically that the sub was not capable of descending to such extreme depths before he was fired.</p><p>That’s according to legal documents obtained by <em>The New Republic</em>. According to the court documents, in a 2018 case, OceanGate employee David Lochridge, a submersible pilot, voiced concerns about the safety of the sub. According to a press release, Lochridge was director of marine operations at the time, “responsible for the safety of all crew and clients.” </p><p>The concerns Lochridge voiced came to light as part of a breach of contract case related to Lochridge refusing to greenlight manned tests of the early models of the submersible over safety concerns. Lochridge was fired, and then OceanGate sued him for disclosing confidential information about the Titan submersible. In response, Lochridge filed a compulsory counterclaim where he alleged wrongful termination over being a whistleblower about the quality and safety of the submersible. </p><p>Lochridge, in his counterclaim, alleged that “rather than addressing Lochridge’s concerns, OceanGate instead summarily terminated Lochridge’s employment in efforts to silence Lochridge and to avoid addressing the safety and quality control issues.” </p><p>The counterclaim said that:</p><p></p><p>The counterclaim also details a meeting at OceanGate’s Everett, Washington, facility with engineering staff where “several individuals had expressed concerns over to the Engineering Director.” The OceanGate CEO, Stockton Rush, asked Lochridge to conduct a quality inspection of the Titan. Per the complaint:</p><p></p><p>Lochridge initially verbally expressed concerns about the safety and quality of the Titan submersible to OceanGate executive management, but those concerns were ignored. Lochridge “identified numerous issues that posed serious safety concerns, and offered corrective action and recommendations for each.” Lochridge was particularly concerned about “non-destructive testing performed on the hull of the Titan” but he was “repeatedly told that no scan of the hull or Bond Line could be done to check for delaminations, porosity and voids of sufficient adhesion of the glue being used due to the thickness of the hull.” He was also told there was no such equipment that could conduct a test like that. </p><p>After Lochridge issued his inspection report, OceanGate officials convened a meeting on January 19, 2018, with the CEO, human resources director, engineering director, Lochridge, and the operations director. Per the complaint:</p><p></p><p>The Titanic is estimated to sit on the ocean floor at a depth of nearly 4,000 meters.</p><p>Paying passengers wouldn’t know or be informed about Lochridge’s concerns, according to his complaints. They also wouldn’t be informed “that hazardous flammable materials were being used within the submersible.” Lochridge expressed concerns about the Titan again. But OceanGate didn’t address those concerns, and Lochridge was fired. </p><p>The case between Lochridge and OceanGate didn’t advance much further, and a few months later the two parties settled.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SlugSlinger, post: 4059768, member: 7248"] And the blame game begins. [ATTACH type="full"]386817[/ATTACH] [HEADING=2]Missing Titanic Sub Once Faced Massive Lawsuit Over Depths It Could Safely Travel To[/HEADING] [HEADING=2]Court documents reveal a former OceanGate employee had several safety complaints over the tourist submersible—and then he was fired.[/HEADING] [URL='https://www.okshooters.com/safari-reader%3A//newrepublic.com/authors/daniel-strauss']Daniel Strauss[/URL]11:59 a.m. ET David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe/Getty Images The tourist submersible that [URL='https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/19/us/missing-submarine-titanic-who-is-on.html']went missing[/URL]while exploring the [I]Titanic[/I] wreck was previously the target of safety complaints from an employee of OceanGate, the parent company that owns the sub and runs tourist expeditions of the wreck. That employee complained specifically that the sub was not capable of descending to such extreme depths before he was fired. That’s according to legal documents obtained by [I]The New Republic[/I]. According to the court documents, in a 2018 case, OceanGate employee David Lochridge, a submersible pilot, voiced concerns about the safety of the sub. According to a press release, Lochridge was director of marine operations at the time, “responsible for the safety of all crew and clients.” The concerns Lochridge voiced came to light as part of a breach of contract case related to Lochridge refusing to greenlight manned tests of the early models of the submersible over safety concerns. Lochridge was fired, and then OceanGate sued him for disclosing confidential information about the Titan submersible. In response, Lochridge filed a compulsory counterclaim where he alleged wrongful termination over being a whistleblower about the quality and safety of the submersible. Lochridge, in his counterclaim, alleged that “rather than addressing Lochridge’s concerns, OceanGate instead summarily terminated Lochridge’s employment in efforts to silence Lochridge and to avoid addressing the safety and quality control issues.” The counterclaim said that: The counterclaim also details a meeting at OceanGate’s Everett, Washington, facility with engineering staff where “several individuals had expressed concerns over to the Engineering Director.” The OceanGate CEO, Stockton Rush, asked Lochridge to conduct a quality inspection of the Titan. Per the complaint: Lochridge initially verbally expressed concerns about the safety and quality of the Titan submersible to OceanGate executive management, but those concerns were ignored. Lochridge “identified numerous issues that posed serious safety concerns, and offered corrective action and recommendations for each.” Lochridge was particularly concerned about “non-destructive testing performed on the hull of the Titan” but he was “repeatedly told that no scan of the hull or Bond Line could be done to check for delaminations, porosity and voids of sufficient adhesion of the glue being used due to the thickness of the hull.” He was also told there was no such equipment that could conduct a test like that. After Lochridge issued his inspection report, OceanGate officials convened a meeting on January 19, 2018, with the CEO, human resources director, engineering director, Lochridge, and the operations director. Per the complaint: The Titanic is estimated to sit on the ocean floor at a depth of nearly 4,000 meters. Paying passengers wouldn’t know or be informed about Lochridge’s concerns, according to his complaints. They also wouldn’t be informed “that hazardous flammable materials were being used within the submersible.” Lochridge expressed concerns about the Titan again. But OceanGate didn’t address those concerns, and Lochridge was fired. The case between Lochridge and OceanGate didn’t advance much further, and a few months later the two parties settled. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What Do You Think About This Mini-Sub deal?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom