What do you think about this ?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

WFT

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
672
Reaction score
19
Location
SKIATOOK
By Craig Andresen

It's going to be an ugly campaign. We all know it and we're ready for it, but it's going to be the ugliest, nastiest and dirtiest campaign in history.

Why NOT take the early lead? If Romney takes this advice, it will send a clear message to the Republican establishment that conservatives aren't going to do business as usual any more. It would shake the establishment and pull together conservative voters.

He would pull together the conservative vote.
Here is a little something else this would do. It would shake the Obama campaign to its core.

As soon as the 1,144 delegates are in hand, WHOEVER garners them either at the convention or before. put this into motion.

Rather than a leisurely march toward a VP nominee or a surprise VP announcement like we got in 2008, vet the possible VPs NOW and stand ready to announce the running mate in a nationally televised press conference the day after the delegates are in hand.

Make the VP choice Allen West.
Having Congressman West in the VP slot makes him a TRIPLE THREAT and a VP who WILL redefine the role. Triple threat? As the Vice President he would attend to the regular duties and be a heartbeat away from the presidency. As Vice President, West would also act as a second Secretary of State in difficult diplomatic negotiations. AND. A Vice President West would work in concert with the Secretary of Defense to realign our military and redefine its role.

Triple threat!

Oh, but this is just the START of the strategy! As soon as the Presidential nominee has introduced West as the running mate. THE NOMINEE WOULD THEN INTRODUCE HIS SECRETARY OF STATE NOMINEE. John Bolton.
As a former Ambassador to the United Nations there is nobody with a better handle on the world's issues or more familiar with the players.
John Bolton is tough, straight forward and not likely to appease ANYONE.
Now, you have the nominee on stage, the VP choice and the Secretary of State nominee. Let's not stop there.

Next to walk onto the stage. Sarah Palin. Nominee for Secretary of Energy.
Palin's directive. Set us on the path toward energy independence in 10 years. Can you think of a better choice? Anyone more invested in that goal? Anyone who is more knowledgeable or adept? I don't. Can you feel the ground starting to shake?

Next out of the wings and onto the stage. The nominee for Secretary of Defense. Enter. General David Petreaus.
As great as he was fighting a Politically Correct (PC) war, imagine what he'll be like once he and West have pressed the reset button on our rules of engagement. In Petraeus we will have a Secretary of Defense whose mission will be to win. PERIOD!

Oh. I'm not done yet. Next up. The nominee for Attorney General. Pam Bondi.
Bondi, Attorney General of Florida, is a no nonsense fighter who has taken on the current administration over Obamacare and WILL clean out the corruption rampant in that office today. Okay, where are we? Who is now standing on the stage? The Presidential nominee and Allen West.
John Bolton. Sarah Palin.General Petreaus and Pam Bondi.


How about a Secretary of the Treasury? We would need someone who has worked for YEARS in the tax field who understands the overwhelming burden of tax codes and who has, for years fought to restructure those codes.
Welcome Michele Bachmann to the stage. The nominee for Secretary of the Treasury.

By now, fissures should be opening in the ground, rumbling coming from the sky and the faint odor of brimstone should be in the air.


We will need someone new with new ideas to head up the Fed. Please
welcome Ron Paul. Yes, I realize this, under Paul, will be a temporary
position; but somehow, I doubt Ron Paul wants to make a career of
running the Fed.

Secretary of the Interior? Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana . COME ON
DOWN!


And finally. We need someone to head up the Department of Homeland
Security. We must have someone who understands the issues we face.
Someone who has worked in federal law enforcement. Someone who won't
take any crap from anybody.
Please. a round of applause for. Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Maricopa County ,
AZ.


Were the GOP nominee to do this. call a press conference and make such
an announcement. it would be unprecedented. Never before has a
presidential nominee entered the full-on campaign with a fully assembled
team.

Can you IMAGINE the shock-and-awe wave that would be sent through the
Obama campaign were the GOP nominee to do this?

Think about it!

From the word GO it would be unlike any previous presidential campaign.
Instead of simply Nominee X against Obama we would have Nominee X vs
Obama.

Congressman Allen West vs. Joe Biden.
John Bolton vs. Hillary Clinton.
Sarah Palin vs. Stephen Chu.
General Petreaus vs. Leon Panetta.
Pam Bondi vs. Eric Holder.
Michele Bachmann vs. Tim Geitner.
Ron Paul vs. Ben Bernake.
Bobby Jindal vs. Ken Salazar.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio vs. Janet Napolitano.

Think about that. Let that sink in. All campaigning at once. There
would be no way out for Obama as each and every key player on his team
would be exposed and held to account from the word GO.

It would be a full-on frontal assault and Obama would have no place to
hide. By adopting this proposal, Obama would be forced into a pot of boiling
water or into the fire. If he tried to rid himself of baggage, he would
be exposed as running from his own record and that of the very people
he's been standing behind for political expediency. If he stays with
them, he would be forced to defend them. Boiling water or a raging
fire. his choice.


It's bold, brash and completely against the establishment business as
usual strategy. It's earth shaking!

An entire assembled team of key cabinet positions. Each one a pitbull on
a T-Bone. hammering their liberal counterparts on every issue, every
day, from the word GO, until November 6th, 2012. We will have to play the cards we're dealt with the GOP nominee, but
tell me THIS strategy wouldn't go a LONG way toward bringing the conservative voters together. Tell me this strategy wouldn't pull in and appeal to independents.

As voters, using THIS strategy, we would be voting for the whole team
rather than just the standard, business-as-usual Presidential 2-person
ticket.
 

peanut

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
2,634
Reaction score
0
Location
Broken Arrow
Problem is, Romney is not a conservative. He is a liar just like the rest of them. Just 6 years ago he was voting(speaking out against) against everything 2A. Now all of a sudden he's a big time hunter.
Brought Romney care to his state before Oboma even thought of it.
 

peanut

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
2,634
Reaction score
0
Location
Broken Arrow
During his 1994 campaign for the United States Senate, Romney voiced his support for an assault weapons ban and the Brady Bill, which were both strongly opposed to by most gun-rights advocates. As a governor, Romney signed legislation to extend the existing assault weapons bans in Massachusetts.

In a strategic move, Romney signed up for a lifetime membership with the NRA leading up to his 2008 presidential campaign. However, he has said on multiple occasions that, while he supports the work of the National Rifle Association, he doesn’t “line up” with them on every issue. Based on Romney’s history and own words, it seems the only thing that he and the NRA agree on is that the Second Amendment exists.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47940

I also ran across McCain’s opposition research from back in 2008.
In 1994 Senate race, Romney backed Brady bill and assault weapons ban, saying “I don’t line up with the
NRA” and “that’s not going to make me the hero of the NRA.”
? Romney called Clinton crime bill “a big step forward.”
? As governor, Romney quadrupled gun licensing fees and vowed not to “chip away” at tough gun laws
? In 2004, Romney signed permanent state-level ban on assault weapons that was mirrored after federal
assault weapons ban.
? In January 2006, Romney said he owned a gun – then two days later admitted he did not and the gun
belonged to his son.
? Romney bragged about being member of the NRA but later revealed he didn’t join until August 2006, just
before launching his presidential campaign.
? Romney recently said he’s “been a hunter pretty much all my life” but later admitted he hunted only twice in
his life, later clarifying remarks by claiming he has hunted “small varmints … more than two times.”
? In 2006 press conference, Romney claimed he had been hunting “many times” after returning from quail hunt
in Georgia.
http://cdn2.dailycaller.com/2012/01/McCain-2008-Oppo-File-on-Romney.pdf

Stop trying to fluff up Romney’s record, it’s not going to work because the media can and will deflate those attempts in the general.
 

mugsy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
4,538
Reaction score
1,112
Location
South West, OK
Peanut - I got it, a true believer would be better but if there isn't a viable one then what is wrong with accepting a man who will vote your way (at least mostly your way) out of political expediency? The whole theory of American government was that shifting coalitions would prevent monolithic parties from enforcing rigid orthodoxies on the people as a whole.

I know 100% certainty is better but that isn't going to happen so what is the next best choice - that is the real question.

Problem is, Romney is not a conservative. He is a liar just like the rest of them. Just 6 years ago he was voting(speaking out against) against everything 2A. Now all of a sudden he's a big time hunter.
Brought Romney care to his state before Oboma even thought of it.
 

mugsy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
4,538
Reaction score
1,112
Location
South West, OK
I have always supported the idea of presidential candidates making, at least tentative, cabinet appointment announcements before the election.
It would definitely be of benefit to the voters.
I think the main issue is that it would give too much opportunity to the opposing candidate's operatives to dig-up dirt that could be extremely damaging to a candidate during the election. I mean finding out that your attorney general candidate, for example, employed illegal aliens to work his house/ as nanny etc after the election is embarrassing but during the election could be a (electorally) fatal distraction.

Maybe a much shorter election cycle - say 12 weeks total - with announcements one week before the general election might minimize the opportunity for dirty politics to take over.
 

peanut

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
2,634
Reaction score
0
Location
Broken Arrow
I can't really say what the next best choice is.
I just hear so many say that Romney is this or that(greatest since sliced bread) but peoe need to know that he is ALSO a Wolf in Sheeps clothing(just like the other guy) not the Saint that some are trying to make him out to be.
Is Romney THE better choice, I'm just not so sure.
 

peanut

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
2,634
Reaction score
0
Location
Broken Arrow
It's people not peoe. See there, i misspelled something. I have to make another post because my phone does not line up with this site for some reason and I can not go back and edit. Thanks, sorry.
 

Lurker66

Sharpshooter
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
9,332
Reaction score
8
Location
Pink
Really? West, Palin, Bachman, Arpaio? Combine them with Romney and Obama wins.

Palin cost McCain an election by turning the VP nomination into a joke.
Bachman is a joke and wont be long in politics.
Arpaio can barely run his county and is turning into a joke.

Romney is going to lose.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom