Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Griffin" data-source="post: 1585961" data-attributes="member: 18194">Thanks for pointing that, I didn&#039;t intend to take the thread off topic... <img src="/images/smilies/image1089.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":teehee:" title="Image1089&nbsp; &nbsp; :teehee:" data-shortname=":teehee:" />If the driver had tried to reiterate that he was armed, defying the command to be quiet, would that have been in violation of &quot;failure to comply&quot;? From what I understand the order has to be lawful, so is it lawful to be ordered to remain silent in the scenario we have seen on the video?That is in line with everything I have read, but since the first officer did not approach the driver for sometime that made it very difficult. After watching the video a second time, it seems the first contact the driver had with the officers was probably when the second officer was searching the backseat. Is that when the driver should have informed them he was armed?Chris Griffin</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Griffin, post: 1585961, member: 18194"] Thanks for pointing that, I didn't intend to take the thread off topic... :teehee: If the driver had tried to reiterate that he was armed, defying the command to be quiet, would that have been in violation of "failure to comply"? From what I understand the order has to be lawful, so is it lawful to be ordered to remain silent in the scenario we have seen on the video? That is in line with everything I have read, but since the first officer did not approach the driver for sometime that made it very difficult. After watching the video a second time, it seems the first contact the driver had with the officers was probably when the second officer was searching the backseat. Is that when the driver should have informed them he was armed? Chris Griffin [/QUOTE]

Verification