Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="freeranger" data-source="post: 1991543" data-attributes="member: 25733"><p>This may be the only alternative IF it comes to the point of disarmament. Groups intent on defending our rights to arms will have to cordon those attempting to disarm citizens. Those attempting to confiscate the firearms will always be outnumbered by those who don&#039;t want to be disarmed. Although they have the superior firepower, we have the superior numbers. It all comes down to willingness to defend and communication among those willing to defend. It&#039;s one thing to have neighbors banding together to fight off inferior starving welfare recipients when SHTF, another to come to the aid of fellow citizens and defend against government agents attempting to disarm. Having said all that, much of this can be avoided by putting government back within it&#039;s Constitutional restraints. That&#039;s why I&#039;m contantly engaged in spreading the usefullness of the Tenth Amendment. Much more peaceful.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="freeranger, post: 1991543, member: 25733"] This may be the only alternative IF it comes to the point of disarmament. Groups intent on defending our rights to arms will have to cordon those attempting to disarm citizens. Those attempting to confiscate the firearms will always be outnumbered by those who don't want to be disarmed. Although they have the superior firepower, we have the superior numbers. It all comes down to willingness to defend and communication among those willing to defend. It's one thing to have neighbors banding together to fight off inferior starving welfare recipients when SHTF, another to come to the aid of fellow citizens and defend against government agents attempting to disarm. Having said all that, much of this can be avoided by putting government back within it's Constitutional restraints. That's why I'm contantly engaged in spreading the usefullness of the Tenth Amendment. Much more peaceful. [/QUOTE]

Verification