Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Why do we need new laws for open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Slack" data-source="post: 1303144" data-attributes="member: 13947"><p>It would not be difficult to get from place to place, but it would require unloading for transportation (notwithstanding SDA). Basically my interpretation changes nothing about the transporting of weapons. Also § 1289.6 seems to be more restrictive on carrying unloaded guns than loaded guns! So that may actually require you to be sure to reload before you get out of the vehicle <img src="/images/smilies/confused.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-shortname=":confused:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I will respond to this later. I see this brought up quite a bit, but I wonder how truly relevant it is to today. I know that it is recognized case law, but the relevant laws have changed significantly since 1929.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree but, § 1272 or § 1289 both reference § 1290 and every time I read an AG's opinion it seems to get into legislative intent. It seems that it would be relevant in the discussion of Pierce v. State.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for the response Veggie and Poke 78</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Slack, post: 1303144, member: 13947"] It would not be difficult to get from place to place, but it would require unloading for transportation (notwithstanding SDA). Basically my interpretation changes nothing about the transporting of weapons. Also § 1289.6 seems to be more restrictive on carrying unloaded guns than loaded guns! So that may actually require you to be sure to reload before you get out of the vehicle :confused: I will respond to this later. I see this brought up quite a bit, but I wonder how truly relevant it is to today. I know that it is recognized case law, but the relevant laws have changed significantly since 1929. I agree but, § 1272 or § 1289 both reference § 1290 and every time I read an AG's opinion it seems to get into legislative intent. It seems that it would be relevant in the discussion of Pierce v. State. Thanks for the response Veggie and Poke 78 [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Why do we need new laws for open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom