Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Why do we need new laws for open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Slack" data-source="post: 1303718" data-attributes="member: 13947"><p>I agree that unlawful carry as defined in 21 O.S. § 1272 has its origins in Section 1992, C.O.S. 1921. In both Pierce v. State (1929) and Byford v. State (1949) unlawful carry was the issue. I don't see how this effects 21 O.S. § 1289.6 which provides exceptions to 21 O.S. § 1272. As far as I know 21 O.S. § 1289.6 didn't go into effect until 1971, many years after both of these cases.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It does quote Pierce in regards to firearms outside the house, but only to establish the legality of firearms within the home. The legality outside the home is not relevant in Gilio v. State (2001). This involved concealed firearms within the home. The open carry of firearms as regulated by 21 O.S. § 1289.6 did not come into play.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Once again none of these address lawful open carry as regulated by 21 O.S. § 1289.6. </p><p></p><p>Is there any case law that involves 21 O.S. § 1289.6?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Slack, post: 1303718, member: 13947"] I agree that unlawful carry as defined in 21 O.S. § 1272 has its origins in Section 1992, C.O.S. 1921. In both Pierce v. State (1929) and Byford v. State (1949) unlawful carry was the issue. I don't see how this effects 21 O.S. § 1289.6 which provides exceptions to 21 O.S. § 1272. As far as I know 21 O.S. § 1289.6 didn't go into effect until 1971, many years after both of these cases. It does quote Pierce in regards to firearms outside the house, but only to establish the legality of firearms within the home. The legality outside the home is not relevant in Gilio v. State (2001). This involved concealed firearms within the home. The open carry of firearms as regulated by 21 O.S. § 1289.6 did not come into play. Once again none of these address lawful open carry as regulated by 21 O.S. § 1289.6. Is there any case law that involves 21 O.S. § 1289.6? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Why do we need new laws for open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom