Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Why I choose to carry a revolver...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glock &#039;em down" data-source="post: 1196816" data-attributes="member: 684"><p>No, as an armed citizen, you are <strong>exactly</strong> right.</p><p></p><p>If any person other than military and LE needs more than 5 or 6 rounds, you've lost already.</p><p></p><p>This mindset falls under a lot of scrutiny nowadays. I don't know if it's because of the multiple assailants theory or what, but everybody thinks they need to carry 50 rounds on their person at any given time. Hell, on duty I only carry one spare mag for my Glock 22. It's there primarily as a backup in case I get a malf.</p><p></p><p>But yeah, you are correctamundo. A person only needs to fire enough rounds to stop the threat and get the hell outta harm's way. I wonder about those guys who say they're gonna blast the BG's ass till he drops and then put one in his head for a little extra "insurance."</p><p></p><p>Christ! <img src="/images/smilies/new/yikes2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":yikes2:" title="Yikes2 :yikes2:" data-shortname=":yikes2:" /> That's not self-defense...that's murder! <img src="/images/smilies/new/ooh2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":ooh2:" title="Ooh2 :ooh2:" data-shortname=":ooh2:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glock 'em down, post: 1196816, member: 684"] No, as an armed citizen, you are [B]exactly[/B] right. If any person other than military and LE needs more than 5 or 6 rounds, you've lost already. This mindset falls under a lot of scrutiny nowadays. I don't know if it's because of the multiple assailants theory or what, but everybody thinks they need to carry 50 rounds on their person at any given time. Hell, on duty I only carry one spare mag for my Glock 22. It's there primarily as a backup in case I get a malf. But yeah, you are correctamundo. A person only needs to fire enough rounds to stop the threat and get the hell outta harm's way. I wonder about those guys who say they're gonna blast the BG's ass till he drops and then put one in his head for a little extra "insurance." Christ! :yikes2: That's not self-defense...that's murder! :ooh2: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Why I choose to carry a revolver...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom