Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Would you have shot?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BadgeBunny" data-source="post: 2317440" data-attributes="member: 1242"><p>Well then when he gets plowed from behind and then (if he survives) tries to claim it was the other guy's fault, the insurance company can have somebody test the tail light to see if it was functional when he was hit. I worked a case where some people tried to sue a trucking company, saying the reason they hit the truck in front of them (actually drove right up under it because the evidence showed they never even tapped their brakes and where doing highway speeds) was the tail lights weren't working. Insurance dug up the truck outta storage, had the lights looked at by a forensics lab and lo, and behold!! Huh. Will you look at that ... Some kind of residue proved the every tail light on the truck was lit up when they smacked it ... Case was dismissed, with costs all around, IIRC ...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BadgeBunny, post: 2317440, member: 1242"] Well then when he gets plowed from behind and then (if he survives) tries to claim it was the other guy's fault, the insurance company can have somebody test the tail light to see if it was functional when he was hit. I worked a case where some people tried to sue a trucking company, saying the reason they hit the truck in front of them (actually drove right up under it because the evidence showed they never even tapped their brakes and where doing highway speeds) was the tail lights weren't working. Insurance dug up the truck outta storage, had the lights looked at by a forensics lab and lo, and behold!! Huh. Will you look at that ... Some kind of residue proved the every tail light on the truck was lit up when they smacked it ... Case was dismissed, with costs all around, IIRC ... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Would you have shot?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom