Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Your free to go Ms. Lerner...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hobbes" data-source="post: 2535011" data-attributes="member: 3371"><p>No, what they have are emails from Lerner that are ambigious enough to be interpretated more than one way.</p><p>The email Issa was exploring at the last committee hearing, for example, was one in which Lerner referred to "the Citizens United problem".</p><p>Now that could be interpretated two different ways:</p><p>It could mean that the citizens united SCOTUS ruling has had the result of a lot more dark money funding conservative groups.</p><p>Or, it could mean that the citizens united ruling resulted in hundreds of more 501c4 applications and the IRS couldn't keep up.</p><p></p><p>They are going to have to find something a lot more incriminating than that if they expect to prosecute anyone.</p><p>If Lerner sent any email more incriminating than that it probably wasn't thru the IRS internal email system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hobbes, post: 2535011, member: 3371"] No, what they have are emails from Lerner that are ambigious enough to be interpretated more than one way. The email Issa was exploring at the last committee hearing, for example, was one in which Lerner referred to "the Citizens United problem". Now that could be interpretated two different ways: It could mean that the citizens united SCOTUS ruling has had the result of a lot more dark money funding conservative groups. Or, it could mean that the citizens united ruling resulted in hundreds of more 501c4 applications and the IRS couldn't keep up. They are going to have to find something a lot more incriminating than that if they expect to prosecute anyone. If Lerner sent any email more incriminating than that it probably wasn't thru the IRS internal email system. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Your free to go Ms. Lerner...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom