Your Vote Counts.....Suckers!

[cjjtulsa]

Yeah, yeah - I'm sure it was just a "typo". And I'm sure it never happens in the general elections, either. Keep believing the fairy tales, folks. We'll see if the Republicans fix it in the "official" results.

http://www.kcci.com/video/30145441/detail.html

 

[ez bake]

His word against theirs - his piece of paper means very little in the way of official evidence. Still, its interesting to say the least. If he's right, and this causes some open-book checks and balances in elections (something I think is long overdue in the age of the Internet), then bravo.

 

[MaddSkillz]

It matters not who you vote for but who counts the votes.

 

[cjjtulsa]

His word against theirs - his piece of paper means very little in the way of official evidence. Still, its interesting to say the least. If he's right, and this causes some open-book checks and balances in elections (something I think is long overdue in the age of the Internet), then bravo.

His word against theirs, but they never denied it. Never denied it, refused to comment on it, and said that since he wasn’t a precinct chair, that he shouldn’t have commented on it, either. Said they won’t comment until the results are certified. May have been a mistake, but still smells like 6 day old fish. And I bet we never hear another word about it.

 

[dyabolical]

Well we already know how the republican party can rig elections.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/feb2001/flor-f05.shtml

 

[458 SOCOM]

Yeah and the dumbacrats would never ever do anything that would resemble election fraud.

Ahem, Acorn!

 

[RickN]

His word against theirs, but they never denied it. Never denied it, refused to comment on it, and said that since he wasn’t a precinct chair, that he shouldn’t have commented on it, either. Said they won’t comment until the results are certified. May have been a mistake, but still smells like 6 day old fish. And I bet we never hear another word about it.

Funny they have been talking about it on Foxnews all day.

 

[cjjtulsa]

Funny they have been talking about it on Foxnews all day.

I'm talking about when they announce the official results. That will be swept under the rug. And who the hell watches Foxnews all day?!?

 

[RickN]

I'm talking about when they announce the official results. That will be swept under the rug. And who the hell watches Foxnews all day?!?

I doubt it will be swept under the rug. Especially since the error went against Santorum but the other error found went for him and against Romney. Sorry but none of it was for Ron Paul.

As for watching Foxnews all day, they were talking about it this morning before I went to sleep and still talking about it this evening when I woke up.

Also something you should read,

http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012...counting-mistakes-in-iowa-caucus-dont-matter/

 

[cjjtulsa]

Sorry but none of it was for Ron Paul.

That's right. And since it was squawked by a Ron Paul supporter, it's why I believe the guy is telling the truth.

As for your link, I think the guy misses the bigger point: with today's technology, how often are the results of any election skewed, and why? If a precinct with fifty-something people can have a discrepancy of around 20 votes, how accurate is any election, and who's policing it?