Never been on their channel. Guess I'll have to watch some video's. Some interesting titles on how to do's.
Never been on their channel. Guess I'll have to watch some video's. Some interesting titles on how to do's.
There's no rights violation. The Constitution applies to the government, not private companies.
True, but if I understand correctly YouTube advertises their platform as a place where ANYONE can talk about ANYTHING. Their company slogan is, or was, “broadcast yourself.” So censorship as such is obviously not a violation of the first amendment. It is however false advertising, and very possibly a breach of contract.
And as always, everything is subject to "their" terms of service which can change at anytime.
There are protections they claim under Section 230 however and if they claim those protections the. They have to be careful how much they censor or they lose those protections as they become a publisher and not just a host.There's no real contract to be breached. There's no consideration, as in we don't pay YouTube in return for their services. There's a terms of service or licensing agreement, but not a contract in the sense that it can be breached and damages demonstrated..
There are protections they claim under Section 230 however and if they claim those protections the. They have to be careful how much they censor or they lose those protections as they become a publisher and not just a host.
Enter your email address to join: