"In 1994, Sig released the P229 pistol, the first production handgun introduced that was chambered in .357 SIG and specifically designed to handle the higher pressures of that round."
I've had a Sig SP2340 in .357 since 2001. Great pistol, I like it better than the traditional Sigs I have. My son bought one at the same time and just recently bought a .40 barrel for it. This model was replaced by the SP2022 and I don't think that model is offered in .357 Sig but they do offer a barrel for it from the factory. Shows out of stock at the moment.
Also have a M&P in .40 that I bought mainly to install a Stormlake .357 barrel in. I haven't had a chance to shoot it much yet but it does work well so far.
Ammo can be expensive and a little harder to find but it's out there. It's not a hard cartridge to reload either.
Also have a M&P in .40 that I bought mainly to install a Stormlake .357 barrel in. I haven't had a chance to shoot it much yet but it does work well so far.
Ammo can be expensive and a little harder to find but it's out there. It's not a hard cartridge to reload either.
Didn't OHP go 357 SIG for awhile? Are they still with it? Why or why not?
Stupid question. Opinions of whether or not I could become proficient with a Glock? They just don't fit my hand. I've never had an issue picking up a Smith, SA or Ruger strikers and being able to shoot them accurately. Not so with the Glocks. I've got a buddy that is the same way with the Smiths. I own a couple he bought and couldn't shoot. He's a Glock guy.
I have a 229 SAS I'm looking to sell, I'll have to find how much ammo I have and put it up
They did, in P226s I believe. They switched to P320s in 9mm IIRC.
M and P's have always pinched my hand. Don't know why, just the geometry I guess.
Ive got same gun. Has 2 slides, 2 barrels, and 9 mags for it in the box. 40 saw and 357 sig. been thinking about letting it go. Just donT shoot it enuf.
