This Is Not Evidence of Election Fraud. It's Just Images and Voices on Your Screen.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

El Pablo

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
8,153
Reaction score
9,185
Location
Yukon
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2020-12-09/how-and-when-scotus-will-overturn-election

Get ready for some fireworks.

The state of Texas (along with Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota) is suing the states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin in the Supreme Court.

Texas is arguing that those four states violated the constitution when they passed new election laws to allow mail-in voting and other changes to their election process.

The Constitution of the United States is explicit that only state legislators NOT state governors, attorney generals, or secretary of states can change how elections are processed.


The media is keeping pretty quiet about this, or attempting to frame it as nothing, but it is a HUGE deal. The Supreme Court has already docketed the case meaning that the SCOTUS will hear it.

If the SCOTUS rules that of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin did in fact violate the constitution (they did), then either:

1) Those votes that were allowed under the new laws are thrown out.

Or…

2) The elections in those states become null and void.

If the outcome is #1, then President Trump wins all four states in a landslide.


Remember, the mail-in ballots were pro-Biden by a massive margin (90%+). If those votes no longer count, Biden loses tens of thousands of votes in all four key states (his margin of victory is only 1% or lower in all four of them).

If the outcome is #2, then 62 electoral college votes vanish from the vote count.

This means NO ONE hits the required 270 electoral college votes to win the election outright and the election moves into Congress as per the 12th Amendment.

There, the House of Representatives votes for the President on a one vote per state basis. The GOP has 26 states, the Democrats have 24 states.

This again, means Trump wins the electio

Ken Paxton, who is still under a felony securities fraud inditement, didn’t sue his own state, Texas, for doing the same crap.
https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/gov...early-voting-period-for-november-3rd-election and Perry expanded the period in which mail-in ballots could be hand-delivered. Using his emergency authority because of the pandemic,
 

ignerntbend

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
15,797
Reaction score
3,270
Location
Oklahoma
Ken Paxton, who is still under a felony securities fraud inditement, didn’t sue his own state, Texas, for doing the same crap.
https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/gov...early-voting-period-for-november-3rd-election and Perry expanded the period in which mail-in ballots could be hand-delivered. Using his emergency authority because of the pandemic,
Yep. That is a serious part of the problem. He's suing other states for what his own state was doing. The difference is that Trump won his state. It makes the whole thing a little problematic. He's currying favor with Trump.
Paxton could use a friend. Everybody needs a friend. You could write a song about it.
 

TedKennedy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
11,537
Reaction score
13,152
Location
Tulsa
Seeing all these states reject the Biden election, joining together to sue gives me hope. A bunch of states didn't feel compelled to be governed by another POS liberal a long time ago. They banded together as well. Didn't turn out so good for the states, or the entire nation.

A peaceful dissolution would be best, but the PTB won't let that happen.
 

ConstitutionCowboy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
6,304
Reaction score
5,207
Location
Kingfisher County
Seeing all these states reject the Biden election, joining together to sue gives me hope. A bunch of states didn't feel compelled to be governed by another POS liberal a long time ago. They banded together as well. Didn't turn out so good for the states, or the entire nation.

A peaceful dissolution would be best, but the PTB won't let that happen.

We the People are the real PTB. No one can stop We the People from declaring a dissolution and if the supposed PTB wish to get in the way, then yes, it wont be peaceful, but dissolution will happen or there will be Armageddon.

I have often thought that The South might have achieved secession had they not fired upon Fort Sumter. That said, the end of slavery was a delightful consequence. The goings on in those four states Texas (and other states) filed suit against for failure to follow their own election law is analogous in that those four states sought to circumvent the Constitution - in essence revolt against the Constitution - in order to secure the results they wanted of the election as opposed to the results of the election they felt they would honestly lose. They might end up losing anyway due to their misprision. The South lost their hold on slavery as a result of their attack on Fort Sumter. The attack on Fort Sumter - the property of the Union - was an attack on the remainder of the several states in the Union. The misprision of the four defendant states in this suit is no less of an attack on the remainder of the states abiding the Constitution.

Personally, no matter which ever way the Court handles this case, I believe heads will roll. YMMV.

Woody

Edited for clarity.
 

SlugSlinger

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
7,936
Reaction score
7,795
Location
Owasso
Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Utah have formally joined Texas in its Supreme court suit against four battleground states who ran illegal and unconstitutional elections. The joining states agree with Texas: the defendant states exploited the COVID-19 pandemic to justify unlawfully enacting last-minute changes and ignoring both federal and state election laws, thus skewing the results of the 2020 General Election.
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
21,852
Reaction score
13,741
Location
Under your bed
Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Utah have formally joined Texas in its Supreme court suit against four battleground states who ran illegal and unconstitutional elections. The joining states agree with Texas: the defendant states exploited the COVID-19 pandemic to justify unlawfully enacting last-minute changes and ignoring both federal and state election laws, thus skewing the results of the 2020 General Election.
I knew this was coming back in the summer or spring.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom