Article said it has all already been repaid.
+1 on that. The only thing that I was wondering about was the fact that the DOJ did the investigation and who knows what agendas they had?
Article said it has all already been repaid.
+1 on that. The only thing that I was wondering about was the fact that the DOJ did the investigation and who knows what agendas they had?
It doesn't need oversight. It needs to stop.
If someone is not arrested, charged, and convicted of a crime, then the state should not be allowed to confiscate their property. Period. Even with a conviction they should only be allowed to seize property that is tied to the crime.
Enter your email address to join: