and if some feels there right to bear arms on there own property is there right why is anyone elses business, so give you alls
and move on no one is going to change my and thousands of others opionon and we are not wanting to change yours either...
- Status
and if some feels there right to bear arms on there own property is there right why is anyone elses business, so give you alls
and move on no one is going to change my and thousands of others opionon and we are not wanting to change yours either...
and if some feels there right to bear arms on there own property is there right why is anyone elses business, so give you alls
I never said it wasn't your right.
Good luck.
its all good VM, it just past pissed me off the other day when LC called me a "criminal" so im probably a little touch about the subject...
i wouldnt open carry myself either BUT i agreewith DD 110% on this one...and would like to see it pass along with more relaxed laws for property owners
Funny how some people want more property owners rights but trample on other property owners rights by ignoring private businesses that have gunbuster signs.
do you have a business? if so do you have a "no gun sign" on it?
I throwing away my guns and putting up gunbuster signs around the outside of my house....at least then I'll know my family is safe.
I am not saying that we ditch our law in its entirety and adopt MOs law. We should take the best parts from MO and adopt them here. Why shouldn't OK be the leader in having the best carry law? As far as open carry, it does not really appeal to me, but being able to carry on my business without worrying about the gray areas (state fair, etc.) really does.
OC law like AZ, property protection laws like TX, and carry anywhere laws like MO. Just think how sweet that would be.
I like the Texas law on gun buster signs. They require large clear standardized signs. I think that a lot of business that now post would probably not put them up.
A few questions if you don't mind
Can you tell me where in the Okla sda law it talks about accidental exposure as brandishing? where it mentions printing?
The only thing I can find is a prohibition on intentional display (title 21 :1290.7 item #5)
Although in the sda course book it says Flashing, brandishing, pointing or intentional displaying constitutes force (when deciding whether to react)
Is this really a problem or just a bunch of hype?
Has anybody on here had their license suspended or revoked for it?
The only people I hear getting worked up about it are here on OSA.
The way the law reads it says concealed means "carried hidden from detection and view of another person" for Okla residents and "fully concealed from detection and view" for non-residents. I don't quite understand the different wording except to hassle non-res. license holders or a typo.
Can you tell me where in the Okla sda law it talks about accidental exposure as brandishing? where it mentions printing?
The only thing I can find is a prohibition on intentional display (title 21 :1290.7 item #5)
Although in the sda course book it says Flashing, brandishing, pointing or intentional displaying constitutes force (when deciding whether to react)
Is this really a problem or just a bunch of hype?
Has anybody on here had their license suspended or revoked for it?
The only people I hear getting worked up about it are here on OSA.
The way the law reads it says concealed means "carried hidden from detection and view of another person" for Okla residents and "fully concealed from detection and view" for non-residents. I don't quite understand the different wording except to hassle non-res. license holders or a typo.
- Status
Similar threads
