Stop resisting.
Y'know, I'm usually the first to complain about police abuses--and among the loudest--but this didn't appear to have anything to do with her being an officer. She could just as easily have been a drunk idiot with a carry permit (or carrying illegally, for that matter). This isn't badge abuse, just (apparently) alcohol abuse.If you’ve done nothing wrong then you shouldn’t have anything to worry about, except some crazy b@tch that thinks you’re in her apartment
That's true. With each apartment having a unique key, her key would not have opened his door. Still not an excuse.The door to the apartment must have been left unlocked.
I’d agree if she hadn’t been in uniform. Just as she may have responded a certain way since she was drunk, He may have responded differently (less hostility) since she was “a copper.” Aren’t we told to trust the police?Y'know, I'm usually the first to complain about police abuses--and among the loudest--but this didn't appear to have anything to do with her being an officer. She could just as easily have been a drunk idiot with a carry permit (or carrying illegally, for that matter). This isn't badge abuse, just (apparently) alcohol abuse.
she may have responded a certain way since she was drunk
That's the general tone of the article, no doubt based on the fact that the chief asked for a blood draw. It's also a reasonable explanation for not realizing you're at the wrong door.Did I miss something saying she was intoxicated?
No I believe it’s the opposite, according to the article, I would assume she claims she’s sober. I was just going off of daves’s “could have been drunk,” statement.Did I miss something saying she was intoxicated?
Who says he did nothing wrong? As another poster has suggested, he must have left his door unlocked. Now his life has been "ruined." What did he expect?If you’ve done nothing wrong then you shouldn’t have anything to worry about, except some crazy b@tch that thinks you’re in her apartment
Enter your email address to join: