Not sure what the sentencing options are but I believe they are charged with felony murder. We’ll have to see what charges they go to trial with and if the jury is allowed to pick lesser charges.
They will not get off Scott free.
Not sure what the sentencing options are but I believe they are charged with felony murder. We’ll have to see what charges they go to trial with and if the jury is allowed to pick lesser charges.
They will not get off Scott free.
******** they didn't suddenly present with a shotgun, he got out of the truck holding it. And again, they had no legal right to stop Arbery.
Hell, you want a lawyer's opinion. lets get one.
For those that will take the time to watch that video. It lays it out pretty clearly.
Hopefully this link will open in front of the paywall. It did for me.
Yes, this guy recused himself but that only makes his opinion legally irrelevant, it does NOT mean he's wrong. It's going to be interesting to see if his take on it being a legal citizen's arrest pans out. The way Colion explained it, it doesn't seem kosher but he doesn't have the info this DA does either.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthe...JcqvM03N1AZs_67Ur2Y_6TAjr16Y_E1Xwu4OtE#page=1
Yes, this guy recused himself but that only makes his opinion legally irrelevant, it does NOT mean he's wrong. It's going to be interesting to see if his take on it being a legal citizen's arrest pans out. The way Colion explained it, it doesn't seem kosher but he doesn't have the info this DA does either.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthe...JcqvM03N1AZs_67Ur2Y_6TAjr16Y_E1Xwu4OtE#page=1
I doubt they get convicted of anything resembling premeditated murder. Maybe manslaughter.
I really expect some more evidence to be presented that will show Arbery in a worse light, and more justification of these two. There is no doubt in my mind that the media is painting this all one way, and there's more to the story.
LA, Ferguson, La Crosse team, Smollet, the 12 year old that claimed white boys cut her dreads off...the media stokes this crap and wants to paint the narrative sooooo bad. They ain't gonna show any evidence supporting the two crackers until they absolutely have to.
If they do get set free, I expect an organized and orderly reaction from the community.
But I'm gonna stock up on popcorn just in case.
The recused DA’s rationale for not charging is pretty much torn apart by Noir’s breakdown. The GBI had access to all the information and more and decided to charge felony murder. When they finally found a DA that wasn’t connected, that DA saw enough to refer to a grand jury.
Like I said before, you can’t take the opinion of a recused DA (who has now been condemned for his handling of the case by the national DA’s association) with personal and/or professional connections to the defendants as gospel while simultaneously dismissing the opinions of another DA and the state’ investigative agency. Are there more facts we don’t know? Are politics in play? Most certainly. Is Arbery’s side playing up the race angle? Absolutely. Doesn’t mean he wasn’t murdered.
Arbery doesn’t have to be a “good kid” for this to be a bad shooting.
The McMichaels don’t have to be evil KKK members for this to be a bad shooting either.
That must be why bird dogs start going on point at a young age.
Horrible owners...
Whatever you say dude . . . owners don't play a role in the growth of a dog at all.
The internet is your friend. You are just as capable of looking up the code section as I am. I am very familiar with trespass law in Georgia since many of Georgia's gun laws intersect trespass laws. Georgia is my home state and that is where I went to law school. I can say with 100% certainty, there was NO TRESPASSING in this case. It's not even a gray area.
Easements almost NEVER include the interior of the structure. People get tripped up on Georgia trespass law because of the notice requirement. Signage alone rarely satisfy the notice requirement according to years of Georgia case law.
Cameras on a location is not notice and I have *never* read case law that would make the legal argument (successfully) that a reasonable person would take a camera to be sufficient notice to "not trespass", especially with the large number of cameras that are out there. And looking for something to take? Yeah...sure looks like that to me.
Attack? Really? And a criminal? Again, what crime did he commit? No need to answer, because it appears very clear that he didn't commit ANY CRIME. Those guys are going to spend a long time in the Georgia correctional system.
Yep, that's not going to happen. The appointed DA is from a county that is full of bulldog prosecutors and the "it's Georgia" isn't going to apply...especially when they have a change in venue due to press coverage. Those guys are going to rot in prison.
You mean the DA that is part of the Glynn County good 'ole boy system? The DA that has nothing to do with this case now? Funny how the GBI director (who is also an attorney) seemed to have found PC pretty damn fast. And before people get all riled up saying that the GBI director (and state AG) are just a bunch of Demorats, do a little research on them. Vic Reynolds is the GBI Director and Chris Carr is the AG. What the Glynn County DA has to say means absolutely nothing in this case.
You're wasting your time. I'm one and am even pretty familiar with Georgia law, but my opinion is met with nothing but, "NO...THAT BLACKMAN DESERVED TO DIE!!!"
Last edited:
Similar threads
