Ahmed Abu Khattala captured in Lybia

[uncle money bags]

http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/arrest-benghazi-suspect-ahmed-abu-khattala-proven-scandal/


What is unknown by many in the western media is that*Khattala's role was with groups connected to Abu Obayda Bin Aljarah Brigade (and F17MB), the very group the Obama Administration assigned to and entrusted to watch over the U.S. embassy.

It was Ansar al-Sharia that prompted the attack and is actually made up of former members of Abu Obayda Bin Aljarah Brigade and the February 17 Martrys Brigade (F17MB).

Well, isnt that nice. Wtf is our government up to over there?

 

[uncle money bags]

"The Libyan militia group that the State Department hired to defend its embattled diplomatic mission in Benghazi had clear AL-Qaida sympathies, and had prominently displayed the AL-Qaida flag on a Facebook page for some months before the deadly attack.

That organization, the February 17th Martyrs Brigade, was paid by the U.S. government to provide security at the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya. But there is no indication the Martyrs Brigade fulfilled its commitment to defend the mission on Sept. 11, when it came under attack."

Yep, just another fake scandal.

 

[dennishoddy]

CNN, the Washington Post, Reuters, had hours long interviews with the guy over a year ago in restaurants and hotel lobby's.

What the fuch is the great "capture" by special forces about? They could have went in as reporters, and took him out.

But wait! Now with the arrest they are admitting the video wasn't the cause?

The state department bimbo under questioning about why the news sources could find the guy, but our special forces couldn't is preposterous.

We spend Billions of dollars a year on surveillance of terrorist, and US citizens every year. We couldn't find the guy that CNN could?

 

[RugersGR8]

We spend Billions of dollars a year on surveillance of terrorist, and US citizens every year. We couldn't find the guy that CNN could?

Other than “It Is Bush’s Fault”, the only answer(s) that ANY MEMBER OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION(from Obama on down) can give to ANY situation and or ANY event is:

1. They had not been made aware of it.
2. They had not read about it.
3. They had not been briefed/informed about it, etc., etc.

 

[Shadowrider]

What are the odds on this guy being Obama's patsy? I'd bet if he was actually there, he was a curious onlooker. Maybe not but his capture sure is convenient. Kinda. In a weird nonsensical way.

 

[dennishoddy]

What are the odds on this guy being Obama's patsy? I'd bet if he was actually there, he was a curious onlooker. Maybe not but his capture sure is convenient. Kinda. In a weird nonsensical way.

Whats weird about this deal, is that in his first hotel lobby interview, he talked about a video that caused a peaceful protest that went bad.

I guess some people watching the parade had RPG's, and Mortars? It gets increasingly weird.

 

[Shadowrider]

What I find weird is why is this guy so important to punish, but 5 of his brethren weren't and just released?

Edit: I heard about a week after the attack that the video they claimed caused the protest had been downloaded like 17 times at that point.

 

[dennishoddy]

Yep, didn't get seen by anybody. Is this guy Obama's *****?

 

[mugsy]

So is this the guy that made the webcast that caused the spontaneous violence? (Sarcasm intended)

 

[uncle money bags]

This is the guy whose defense lawyers will say it was an internet video, and he was a patsy.
Or he may man up and take full credit.
Either way its going to be an interesting chapter to read.