AR Scope choice

[ronny]

Too many choices out there. I ran onto a Leupold Mark AR 1.5-4x20 which looks pretty good, as well.

 

[jakerz]

For the price point you are looking at, you could try the Primary Arms.

https://www.primaryarms.com/Primary_Arms_1_4X_24_Illuminated_Scope_PA14X_p/pa14x.htm

 

[ronny]

Thanks, I had just run across that one, too. That looks like a copy of the Millet (or is it the VISM? I've seen too many today).

 

[jakerz]

Not sure, I just know that PA makes pretty decent replica scopes. I have one of their T1 clones and it has held up pretty good.

 

[ronny]

Alright, let's try this again. I've branched out. Anyone have any experience with either the NIKON M-223 1-4x20 or the Leupold Mark AR 1.5-4x20?

 

[AKguy1985]

I want a redfield battlezone for my A4.

http://swfa.com/Redfield-3-9x42-Battlezone-Rifle-Scope-P59509.aspx

 

[Daryl Licht]

Check out the Burris TAC30.

 

[jakerz]

Check out the Burris TAC30.

I've read good stuff on the tac 30. I ran their XTR for awhile and it was a nice scope.

 

[Shootin 4 Fun]

The Nikon P-223 seems to be a very nice scope for the $150 price range.

 

[henschman]

Get the Burris TAC30... it isn't too much more than the Millet, and it has much better glass (Filipino instead of Chinese). It has a nice BDC reticle, too. Plus the illumination is true daylight visible, unlike the others you have mentioned. I have a TAC30 and my buddy has a Millet... mine is a much better scope. FYI the Primary Arms is indeed the same scope as the Millet... just with a different reticle design.

If the TAC30 is too expensive for you, I would go with a Weaver V3 1-3x20. It has MUCH better glass than any of those Chinese scopes... really amazing glass for the money. The only thing it doesn't have is an illuminated reticle, which isn't that big of a deal anyway.