Well, the ATF is at it again.
Are you surprised?
I'm surprised that it is still $200. In 1934 when the NFA went into effect, the Maxim 'Silencer' cost around $5. The $200 was basically the same cost as a used car back then, and designed to deter folks from acquiring SBR's, suppressors, etc. because the legal means of ownership was just so ridiculously expensive. Obviously $200 today is manageable for most, and it's become a money grab more than a deterrent. I wouldn't be surprised to see legislation come forward to raise the tax stamp into the $1000's. I remember there was a house bill in 2016 or 2017 that tried to raise it to $500, but nothing ever came of it (thankfully).The BATFE just wants their $200 tax
What about stocks in general? Are they protected? Handguards? Are they protected? We could go down a whole laundry list of parts of a gun that aren’t protected. If you want to buy that reasoning, they could outlaw all kinds of parts to guns and make any functioning gun almost useless because any given part that isn’t part that doesn’t render it inoperable would be fair game.I said it about the bump stocks, and I'll say it about the braces....they are not constitutionally protected. Be prepared to buy a legal stock and pay the $$ for a stamp with those "pistols".
Enter your email address to join: