Like I stated, incredibly short sighted and no memory of recent events whatsoever. As someone who's followed this entire fiacso very closely since the story broke, the anecdotal and circumstantial evidence that this was a politically motivated, or at the very least a politically expedient operation is overwhelming.
My comment had to do with the specific comments in this specific article, not about the entire operation.
It may very well turn out that there was some big plan and conspiracy behind how the operation was handled -- I'm not denying that (although there's no direct evidence of that yet).
What I was saying was that email which was the basis of that article in December isn't an indicator of some larger plan, especially one which includes more sweeping firearms regulation than what that article speaks of (requiring reporting of multiple purchases by a single individual).