Ha ha ha. All those "metallic vibratory devices."
Ha ha ha. All those "metallic vibratory devices."
not worried about it safe is lined with a big sheet of lead and all firearms were lost in a tragic boating accident a few weeks ago..
Nope. Not possible. Needa take some physics classes.
That's just it....
....while the x-ray may not penetrate your home to see weapons, they can easily see the boat in the back yard with the patched hole in the bottom.
Whether information gathered by such means without a warrant would depend on general availability and affordability of the technology to the masses. Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)
Airwolf has Doppler INS/DNS x-ray capability. It is locked out when the helicopter is in supersonic burst mode tho.There is an override switch in the PCLs.
How fast were the helicopters moving over Tulsa?
How fast were the helicopters moving over Tulsa?
Who needs x-rays? Got drones?
[The air force document explains that the air force will be overseeing the deployment of its own military surveillance drones within the borders of the US; that it may keep video and other data it collects with these drones for 90 days without a warrant – and will then, retroactively, determine if the material can be retained – which does away for good with the fourth amendment in these cases. While the drones are not supposed to specifically "conduct non-consensual surveillance on on specifically identified US persons", according to the document, the wording allows for domestic military surveillance of non-"specifically identified" people (that is, a group of activists or protesters) and it comes with the important caveat, also seemingly wholly unconstitutional, that it may not target individuals "unless expressly approved by the secretary of Defense"....
What happens to those images, that audio? "Distribution of domestic imagery" can go to various other government agencies without your consent, and that imagery can, in that case, be distributed to various government agencies;...]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/21/coming-drone-attack-america
[The air force document explains that the air force will be overseeing the deployment of its own military surveillance drones within the borders of the US; that it may keep video and other data it collects with these drones for 90 days without a warrant – and will then, retroactively, determine if the material can be retained – which does away for good with the fourth amendment in these cases. While the drones are not supposed to specifically "conduct non-consensual surveillance on on specifically identified US persons", according to the document, the wording allows for domestic military surveillance of non-"specifically identified" people (that is, a group of activists or protesters) and it comes with the important caveat, also seemingly wholly unconstitutional, that it may not target individuals "unless expressly approved by the secretary of Defense"....
What happens to those images, that audio? "Distribution of domestic imagery" can go to various other government agencies without your consent, and that imagery can, in that case, be distributed to various government agencies;...]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/21/coming-drone-attack-america
I'm telling you guys, the smartest thing I ever did was marry into the NWO ...
Similar threads
- Locked
