Uh, Festus, answer your own ? If the gun hadn't gone off inadvertently, you wouldn't have fallen and bumped yr melon, would you?
Uh, Festus, answer your own ? If the gun hadn't gone off inadvertently, you wouldn't have fallen and bumped yr melon, would you?
Unlike many here, I watched the whole thing. Seemed pretty straightforward to me, though I don't see left wing plots wherever I look, unlike some.
Ya'll check this out. Remington's response is in there somewhere. I find it awful high on fluff and lacking any detail what so ever. But that's me, make your own judgement.
http://www.remington700.tv/#/home
i don't get this sentiment. Just because its a possible known defect why does all of the responsibility suddenly shift to someone else, someone who had no control over where the weapon was pointed? If this was due to a random fluke, like something in the gun broke due to old age or for some other unknown reason, who would be to blame then?
The fact that the gun went off, if it was due to a known manufacturer defect, lies with the gun company, no question. But the fact that someone got hurt or killed by the gun going off lies with the person pointing the gun. Thats why she's getting bagged on.
It all follows the old addage, "Guns don't kill people, PEOPLE kill people"
Enter your email address to join: