Socialism would be a touch more palatable if the division of wealth was actually shared by the contributors. (and this has been done in some places)
In practice in the United States, wealth is taken from earners, and given to non-earners. The system is setup to promote dependence. Given the diversity of the U.S., and disproportional use of these stolen funds, the system breeds enmity between groups.
The arguments that "we don't want socialism in the U.S." are 100% nonsense. We already have it, and have had for decades.
In practice in the United States, wealth is taken from earners, and given to non-earners. The system is setup to promote dependence. Given the diversity of the U.S., and disproportional use of these stolen funds, the system breeds enmity between groups.
The arguments that "we don't want socialism in the U.S." are 100% nonsense. We already have it, and have had for decades.