Double Jeopardy, Mr. Zimmerman!

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Glock

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
750
Reaction score
0
Location
NorCen
I'll give you the protesting public driving the sensationalism of the case... It harkens to ancient Rome where popular opinion weighed heavily on the death or life of their fellow people and slaves. It's terrible. But those people have a voice, and every right to voice those opinions. The gov has the duty to make damn sure no rights were violated. Juror B37 clearly stated that race had nothing to do with Zim's use of self defense. Most of y'all have stated that the evidence of his history clearly bunks the allegations... So what's really the problem here? Thugs have rights too.
 

0311

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
2,293
Reaction score
2
Location
Hell
I'll give you the protesting public driving the sensationalism of the case... It harkens to ancient Rome where popular opinion weighed heavily on the death or life of their fellow people and slaves. It's terrible. But those people have a voice, and every right to voice those opinions. The gov has the duty to make damn sure no rights were violated. Juror B37 clearly stated that race had nothing to do with Zim's use of self defense. Most of y'all have stated that the evidence of his history clearly bunks the allegations... So what's really the problem here? Thugs have rights too.

The agitators are the problem. I must say one thing in J. Jackson's favor though, and I respect him for this; he spoke up for Terri Schiavo as her husband starved her to death. I saw a ray of good in the man when he did that.
 

Glock

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
750
Reaction score
0
Location
NorCen
And like Rome, we shall fall. I'd probably have a beer with Jackson, and even Sharpton... More than likely good guys, just some really bad politics.
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
30,036
Reaction score
17,655
Location
Collinsville
I'll give you the protesting public driving the sensationalism of the case... It harkens to ancient Rome where popular opinion weighed heavily on the death or life of their fellow people and slaves. It's terrible. But those people have a voice, and every right to voice those opinions. The gov has the duty to make damn sure no rights were violated. Juror B37 clearly stated that race had nothing to do with Zim's use of self defense. Most of y'all have stated that the evidence of his history clearly bunks the allegations... So what's really the problem here? Thugs have rights too.

The problem is a president and attorney general interjecting racial bias and prejudice before they're evident. The problem is an attorney general continuing to threaten a man found not guilty in a court of law, from a racially aligned bully pulpit two days in a row now. What we're doing now is voicing OUR rights to demand the rule of law be respected and adhered to. The attorney general has zero business calling for changes in states law because of this incident. His only job as AG is to fairly and equitably enforce the laws on the books in federal statutes. In that situation, he should be keeping his damn mouth shut at this time.

As for thugs, do they have the right to savagely assault people who reasonably consider them and their actions suspicious?
 

BIG_MIKE2005

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
1,330
Reaction score
0
Location
Skiatook
The problem is a president and attorney general interjecting racial bias and prejudice before they're evident. The problem is an attorney general continuing to threaten a man found not guilty in a court of law, from a racially aligned bully pulpit two days in a row now. What we're doing now is voicing OUR rights to demand the rule of law be respected and adhered to. The attorney general has zero business calling for changes in states law because of this incident. His only job as AG is to fairly and equitably enforce the laws on the books in federal statutes. In that situation, he should be keeping his damn mouth shut at this time.

As for thugs, do they have the right to savagely assault people who reasonably consider them and their actions suspicious?

Agreed. The political side of this is disgusting & obvious to everyone what they are doing.
 

0311

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
2,293
Reaction score
2
Location
Hell
[Broken External Image]

Rev. Al Sharpton and leading ministers will appeal for a federal investigation into the shooting death of Trayvon Martin in a press conference at 9 a.m. They also will announce that in 100 cities this Saturday vigils will be convened by national preachers outside of federal buildings.
 

0311

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
2,293
Reaction score
2
Location
Hell
So Holder says it's the fault of the Stand Your Ground Law, so once again it's back to attacking the 2nd amendment.



Yeh, looks like they are going to try to make us defenseless against violent attackers. Like on that video of that mom being attacked in her home around 3 weeks ago. I didn't see Holder or the President or Sharpton speaking up for her.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BIG_MIKE2005

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
1,330
Reaction score
0
Location
Skiatook
Yeh, looks like they are going to try to make us defenseless against violent attackers. Like on that video of that mom being attacked in her home around 3 weeks ago. I didn't see Holder or the President or Sharpton speaking up for her.

Exactly & it's because it didn't fit their agenda. I knew this was coming & so did they, only difference is they expected a guilty verdict to help them along the way. Now it's a uphill battle against it & they will meet extreme resistance once they start attacking the right to defend yourself weather a gun is involved or not.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom