Richards v. County of Yolo (E.D. Cal.)
Under the statutory scheme, even if Plaintiffs are denied a concealed weapon license for self-defense purposes from Yolo County, they are still more than free to keep an unloaded weapon nearby their person, load it, and use it for self-defense in circumstances that may occur in a public setting. Yolo County’s policy does not substantially burden Plaintiffs’ right to bear and keep arms. Therefore, rational basis review applies.
^.^ I thought "rational basis review" required sound application of logic. Seriously, how do law schools who produce these types of products with no natural or artificial intelligence stay in business? (Then again, I guess you have to produce defectives to ensure job security for products that pass quality control. Still, they should at least assign serial numbers and issue periodic recalls.)
By the way, the "longstanding prohibitions" exception from Heller was used to support the ruling.
Under the statutory scheme, even if Plaintiffs are denied a concealed weapon license for self-defense purposes from Yolo County, they are still more than free to keep an unloaded weapon nearby their person, load it, and use it for self-defense in circumstances that may occur in a public setting. Yolo County’s policy does not substantially burden Plaintiffs’ right to bear and keep arms. Therefore, rational basis review applies.
^.^ I thought "rational basis review" required sound application of logic. Seriously, how do law schools who produce these types of products with no natural or artificial intelligence stay in business? (Then again, I guess you have to produce defectives to ensure job security for products that pass quality control. Still, they should at least assign serial numbers and issue periodic recalls.)
By the way, the "longstanding prohibitions" exception from Heller was used to support the ruling.
