Wow! The anti troll. Welcome aboard, your blog looks entertaining. I'll be sure to spend some time with it.
Still stand by this?
"I had to politely add an asterisk to her comment. While it might have been written for all humans, black folk weren’t considered humans back then (as Justice Taney makes clear in the Dred Scott decision, surely the founders did not want those creatures having guns). Obviously, we’ve come a long way since then. But we can’t erase history, even when it’s ugly and uncomfortable. I think the gun community should be more vocal about stuff like this. It would lend us a lot more credibility with groups that are sometimes suspicious of the squeaky clean “guns are the great equalizer” mantra. Yes, it’s true. But it’s complicated."
I believe it was 2/3 to limit the impact on voting in some areas.
"I had to politely add an asterisk to her comment. While it might have been written for all humans, black folk weren’t considered humans back then (as Justice Taney makes clear in the Dred Scott decision, surely the founders did not want those creatures having guns). Obviously, we’ve come a long way since then. But we can’t erase history, even when it’s ugly and uncomfortable. I think the gun community should be more vocal about stuff like this. It would lend us a lot more credibility with groups that are sometimes suspicious of the squeaky clean “guns are the great equalizer” mantra. Yes, it’s true. But it’s complicated."
I believe it was 2/3 to limit the impact on voting in some areas.
Short answer is yes. Almost everything is more complicated than a single blog post could ever cover, but in a word, yes.
www.FrontSightPress.com
www.CitizensSafety.com
www.Rangemaster.com
Are you trolling her introduction thread? Seriously?
No troll. Her blog had the statement, not her intro. Concerned?
And I do agree, a single blog post could not ever consider the expanse of an idea. Though perhaps, it might provide a perspective.
And I do agree, a single blog post could not ever consider the expanse of an idea. Though perhaps, it might provide a perspective.
Last edited:
You're trolling her intro thread here on OSA by picking through her blog? Not really concerned, I don't get concerned with forum things on the interwebz, but she's new here. Manners much?
Not to burden the point, but the her web links web provides an much more extensive history that she choose to provide. That said, I didn't research but was provided access for for my information. So, I have no intent to chase her off, but her available web history is relevant in my opinion. I'd guess she'd have few reservations about anyone pursuing that history. I mean since she posted the links.
I've had the chance to read a few blog posts. How refreshing to read such intelligent, well-written material. Thank you!
welcome
