In OK? Really?

[caliberbob]

But that is not true here. He had child porn on his computer. Just because the DA couldn't "prove" the kids were under 18 doesn't make it any less disgusting. Or dangerous. Like Justice Stewart said when asked to define "obscene" -- I know it when I see it.

The fact that he had that stuff on his computer is enough for me. Just because someone couldn't identify and find birthdates for the young men in the pictures/videos doesn't absolve him. He HAD THE **** ON HIS COMPUTER.

I worked for a short while for an attorney who defended sex offenders. In the 18 months I worked for him not a single solitary man who came to him who had been charged with offenses against minors was innocent. Not A SINGLE ONE. And every one of them TO THE MAN said the children "asked" them to show them how to have sex!

I will never understand people who think that because someone got off on a technicality that means they are innocent. NOTHING could be further from the truth.

At this point he is just arguing to argue. He knows he’s wrong but pride is a powerful thing

 

[JD8]

I don't love you or any other pedophile.

Well thanks for sharing. Given your incoherent responses it seems these boys broke you.

 

[Buddhaman]

But that is not true here. He had child porn on his computer. Just because the DA couldn't "prove" the kids were under 18 doesn't make it any less disgusting. Or dangerous. Like Justice Stewart said when asked to define "obscene" -- I know it when I see it.

The fact that he had that stuff on his computer is enough for me. Just because someone couldn't identify and find birthdates for the young men in the pictures/videos doesn't absolve him. He HAD THE **** ON HIS COMPUTER.

I worked for a short while for an attorney who defended sex offenders. In the 18 months I worked for him not a single solitary man who came to him who had been charged with offenses against minors was innocent. Not A SINGLE ONE. And every one of them TO THE MAN said the children "asked" them to show them how to have sex!

I will never understand people who think that because someone got off on a technicality that means they are innocent. NOTHING could be further from the truth.

Fine, he’s a pedophile. The law failed and he got away. Good night OSA.

 

[Buddhaman]

At this point he is just arguing to argue. He knows he’s wrong but pride is a powerful thing

Nope. He’s a pedophlle who should have been castrated. There, I’ve fallen into the hive mindset where others tell me what to think for my own good. I love caliberbob.

 

[THAT Gurl]

At this point he is just arguing to argue. He knows he’s wrong but pride is a powerful thing

I hope you are right. I'm having trouble reconciling the person I thought he was with the person I've seen in this thread.

 

[THAT Gurl]

Fine, he’s a pedophile. The law failed and he got away. Good night OSA.

Dude ...

 

[Buddhaman]

I hope you are right. I'm having trouble reconciling the person I thought he was with the person I've seen in this thread.

You’ve met me like, twice?

Dude ...

What? I’ve had multiple people tell me he’s a pedophile. I’ll concede that since he had questionable porn we have to assume the worst and he is a pedophlle. What would you prefer I say?

 

[HillsideDesolate]

Pride

Nope. He’s a pedophlle who should have been castrated. There, I’ve fallen into the hive mindset where others tell me what to think for my own good. I love caliberbob.

I too love caliberbob, nohomo.

 

[caliberbob]

Pride

I too love caliberbob, nohomo.

 

[OHJEEZE]

Jesus loves you @Buddhaman

Come on over to the Light!