Yes they do. I've had three Buck Mark 22s and they fell very short of the Ruger.
Different strokes I guess. I had a MKIII and a 22/45 that I did not love. My buckmark has been flawless
Now a Glock in 44MAG. Id buy one of thoes
Yes they do. I've had three Buck Mark 22s and they fell very short of the Ruger.
Guess the one my son has was made on Wednesday cause it is perfect until filthy !!Yes they do. I've had three Buck Mark 22s and they fell very short of the Ruger.
Pretty hard to do with a rimmed cartridge in a normal magazine's footprint.Many on other forums say they want a .22LR in the G48 size but others say they prefer it in the G19 or even G17 size for a trainer and hopefully more capacity than is normally available in .22 caliber pistols.
I think the G19/17 size makes more sense.
A real Glock, not Umarex, 22LR that is striker fired with no thumb safety and high capacity magazines sized like center-fire mags would be a winner for an inexpensive way to put thousands of rounds a year down range while training.
Also, a Glock .22 would make it possible to add rimfire to GSSF matches.
My son has an SR22 and it’s been very good so far. He had the Mark IV but i wanted him to have a pistol that operates like others.Me too. The Sig Mosquito and the Walther P-22 were junk. I had considered the Ruger SR22 but I’m afraid it would be the same as the Walther.
My son has an SR22 and it’s been very good so far. He had the Mark IV but i wanted him to have a pistol that operates like others.
Enter your email address to join: