Garand Thumb: S&W vs Korth 44mags vs Glock 9mm
(Go to 2:55min to skip ads)
(Go to 2:55min to skip ads)
Last edited:
With far better value retention than a Bentley, haha.Korth is the Bentley of the revolver world.
Coming from about 25 years of machining and manufacturing here. Yes that "vane" is simply a large burr left in there from the machining. Could have been that the slotting cutter used to cut the recess to hold the sideplate tang had been reground too many times or just a tool length offset set a couple of thousandths off. It's in an area that has basically no function to the mechanism as long as it's not impinging on the hammer. I agree with you that it's piss poor workmanship but they all do that stuff these days. Ruger has been bad about not touching anything that didn't have to be touched inside their revolvers for about forever it seems. That's just the "cost reduction world" we live in today, they let the customer do the QC. They gamble that there won't be an issue and if there is they'll fix it. Most will never pull the sideplate like you did and would never be the wiser.Wanted to touch bases on your assertion.
Well this 'billet aluminum' piece had a big ol' spot where there was an uneven metal "vane" sticking out after 'machining' that was probably .002" thick and a full 1/8" wide. It broke off with almost no pressure when I gave it a push with a little brass punch. Here's the aftermath photos that I just took now (gun needed torn apart and cleaned anyway).
That vane resembled any kind of casting flash you'd see on a poor quality gun...almost like something you'd see on the outside of a plastic toy at the dollar store.
View attachment 262218
As you can see, there is still enough of it left to show up on a cell phone camera. I'd expect this from a Taurus, but not S&W.
However, I see no other evidence of casting marks, so I will concede that you're correct and this is somehow billet. But I don't know what kind of machining they do there at S&W...here's another example of left over material in the same gun (in green).
View attachment 262220
Coming from about 25 years of machining and manufacturing here. Yes that "vane" is simply a large burr left in there from the machining. Could have been that the slotting cutter used to cut the recess to hold the sideplate tang had been reground too many times or just a tool length offset set a couple of thousandths off. It's in an area that has basically no function to the mechanism as long as it's not impinging on the hammer. I agree with you that it's piss poor workmanship but they all do that stuff these days. Ruger has been bad about not touching anything that didn't have to be touched inside their revolvers for about forever it seems. That's just the "cost reduction world" we live in today, they let the customer do the QC. They gamble that there won't be an issue and if there is they'll fix it. Most will never pull the sideplate like you did and would never be the wiser.
Enter your email address to join: