He always gives us an epistemological snapshot of how the other third thinks.
Many people believe truth to be the hardest intangible object one could possess. So I can see two-thirds wallowing in their own dis-illusion as an accurate assessment.
He always gives us an epistemological snapshot of how the other third thinks.
I never said things are true or not true based on whether I personally observe that specific event. I said I deem things to be true based on observations. This would include my observation and opinion of the source of information among many other observations. You put words in my mouth and came to an incorrect conclusion. I simply disagreed and said I never said that.
And no, I never said something is true because I simply stated it to be truth.
Again, you're putting words in my mouth.
It's a logical conclusion based on your statements.
I'm trying to understand, how someone who claims to believe in science, can simply ignore scientific tests, which are observable, repeatable and testable.
The earth is riddled with space rocks that came here all on their own. It happens constantly.
Ok, I get it.... its only true if YOU say its true.. gotcha!
Many people believe truth to be the hardest intangible object one could possess. So I can see two-thirds wallowing in their own dis-illusion as an accurate assessment.
Thats because they can't handle the truth!There aint nothin unique about being unhappy about the truth. I never met anybody that was happy with the truth.
...which leaves the other third trapped in a dis-illusion of their own, one which creates the illusion that everyone else is deluded, and that only they are on the enlightened path.
Enter your email address to join: