New Pics of the Apollo 11 Landing Site

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

penismightier

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
1,848
Reaction score
4
Location
NE OK
I never said things are true or not true based on whether I personally observe that specific event. I said I deem things to be true based on observations. This would include my observation and opinion of the source of information among many other observations. You put words in my mouth and came to an incorrect conclusion. I simply disagreed and said I never said that.

And no, I never said something is true because I simply stated it to be truth.

Again, you're putting words in my mouth.

It's a logical conclusion based on your statements.





I'm trying to understand, how someone who claims to believe in science, can simply ignore scientific tests, which are observable, repeatable and testable.
 

SMS

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
15,335
Reaction score
4,326
Location
OKC area
Many people believe truth to be the hardest intangible object one could possess. So I can see two-thirds wallowing in their own dis-illusion as an accurate assessment.

...which leaves the other third trapped in a dis-illusion of their own, one which creates the illusion that everyone else is deluded, and that only they are on the enlightened path.
 

been

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
7,881
Reaction score
16
Location
Midwest City
your argument is invalid.jpg
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom