I believe this guy was a five time convicted felon.So let me get this straight, some of y’all are complaining that the 9th circuit actually ruled IN FAVOR of a citizens 2A rights?? I don’t care how many felonies this guy has had, if he is out of prison then he should have ALL his rights restored, period. Now I know some of y’all Fudds don’t like that. But shall not be infringed means what it says, whether you agree with it or not.