The death penalty is repugnant, but seemed appropriate in this case.
On the other hand though, giving the state the right to kill judicially seems like a bad idea, especially these days.
Governments regularly abuse such powers, we should take that power away while we can.
If the death penalty is kept then changes have to be made.
Lethal injection has proven problematic, time to move away from that.
I think the people that have to perform their duty for the state shouldn't have to suffer either.
There 's no need for trauma to the condemned or risk to those performing their duty.
A method such as nitrogen asphyxiation would be more humane to both the condemned and the executioner(s).
Here's an idea: Set up a death cell equipped to perform nitrogen asphyxiation and amend the state constitution to make execution the duty of the Governor, not delegated to DOC. I wonder how many governors would push the button or pull the lever themselves?
On the other hand though, giving the state the right to kill judicially seems like a bad idea, especially these days.
Governments regularly abuse such powers, we should take that power away while we can.
If the death penalty is kept then changes have to be made.
Lethal injection has proven problematic, time to move away from that.
I think the people that have to perform their duty for the state shouldn't have to suffer either.
There 's no need for trauma to the condemned or risk to those performing their duty.
A method such as nitrogen asphyxiation would be more humane to both the condemned and the executioner(s).
Here's an idea: Set up a death cell equipped to perform nitrogen asphyxiation and amend the state constitution to make execution the duty of the Governor, not delegated to DOC. I wonder how many governors would push the button or pull the lever themselves?