What "we" need . . . for what?This
Walters is exactly what we need.
Do exactly what he sits in his car and whines about happening on twitter?
What "we" need . . . for what?This
Walters is exactly what we need.
TRUE! But that presumes a level of intelligence and personal responsibility that isn't necessarily warranted. And the effectiveness is not in having a right... it's in the exercise of that right! [If it ain't exercised, it just don't work, Horatio.]They have that right already by not getting pregnant in the first place.
TRUE! But that presumes a level of intelligence and personal responsibility that isn't necessarily warranted. And the effectiveness is not in having a right... it's in the exercise of that right! [If it ain't exercised, it just don't work, Horatio.]
You are indeed a lucky husband, so give prayerful thanks - daily!My wife teaches 3rd grade . . . and has never been a member of the OEA.
I don't know what's in the training from Hillsdale and I'm guessing you don't either. Maybe it's an accurate view of history, not like what they get from anti-racism training where this country was founded on racism. The 1619 Project for an example (a link to this is on the OEA website):My wife teaches 3rd grade . . . none of that is in her classroom. She deals with 26 kids every day and barely has time to cover her lesson plans for the day. She's taught for 15 years or more and has never been a member of the OEA.
Extremes from either side have no business in classrooms. Anyone who claims to not want indoctrination in schools but would support Walters trying to require teachers to take these types of classes needs to re-think how they actually view indoctrination. You either support it or you don't. Being okay with it as long as it's from "your side" isn't better.
Walters creates problems where there are none in my opinion. And then goes to the extreme to try and fix something that realistically doesn't need fixing.
I do completely agree with your last statement, TK, but in your first statement, I don't think you remembered that (regardless of the father's identity) you do - and every taxpayer does - have to 'finance it' for its welfare-dependent life.As long as it ain't my spawn, and I don't have to finance it, why should I get involved?
What "we" need . . . for what?
Do exactly what he sits in his car and whines about happening on twitter?
I do completely agree with your last statement, TK, but in your first statement, I don't think you remembered that (regardless of the father's identity) you do - and every taxpayer does - have to 'finance it' for its welfare-dependent life.
GREAT idea!!!! (Especially for "young liberal folk.")Oh, I most certainly am aware. That's why I FULLY support abortion, just not in my family.
I'd go a step further if possible and offer young folks a grand each if they'd get fixed. And absolutely require getting fixed as a condition of welfare.
Shouldn't a teacher be required to know the truth and the history vs what is be promoted in the education system currently which is exactly opposite what the constitution spells out?Courses like that are fine . . . I just disagree with any of them being requirements to be a teacher.