You mean like the channel where Williams used to work? I guess that works if you want their internal censors to choose what you get to be informed on.
Simply put, O'Reilly sucks as bad as Matthews, but FOX doesn't suck as bad as MSNBC. The problem is your inability to separate the former from the latter.My inability??? Where are you comming up with this stuff?? My inability, you full of sh! T today. For you and your cohorts,My cohorts??? What is this this?? Are there teams or sides now?? O'Reilly DEFINES FOX. He doesn't.
Oh don't be so obtuse. Yes, I'm saying you implied it. Based on ratings, if you eliminate FOX & CNN, you're left with the major networks. Every one of those is full on liberal, at least on the news teams. And yes, you and several other liberals on this forum can never be satisfied, even when we agree with you! Here you have a thread full of people saying O'Reilly (you remember, the subject of this thread?) is as full of crap as a Christmas Goose. Yet you can't appreciate that fact without going for the throat. You have to go after FOX as proof of everything wrong with conservatism. Then you want to feign some egregious wound when we call you on it? the problem as I see it is when a "thread full of people" agree it's ok as long as me or my cohorts don't agree to much or too loud. That kinda rubs ya don't it? That you actually have to agree with a "Liberal"?
You have ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC and NBC, whereas we have FOX. Just like Obama, you can't stand that a major media outlet would dare contradict the holy edicts of the DNC. I'm a registered Independent, I could care less what either party does or says)Youve never said one single positive thing about FOX, because you're opposed to it on principle.very not true, I don't say anything positive about CNN or MSNBC either, but then this thread ain't about MSNBC or CNN telling lies it's about O'reilly being a liar. It would literally give you a brain aneurysm to even consider it! So go ahead, hate FOX news. Just don't expect anyone to agree with you. I never post expecting anyone to agree or even disagree with because it's my opinion. Do you need OSAs stamp of approval for your opinions??
The majority of us(who is us?) on here(do you speak for all of OSA?) get our news from multiple sources that fall outside the MSM, including FOX. you really don't know how many OSAers watch Fox or Orielly do you? Thats just talkin out ur azz.However, there are many, many Americans who wouldn't get anything except the DNC approved slant on the news (if it's reported at all) without FOX. (again I like how you decide to speak for all of America)So call FOX propaganda if you want, just don't poke your own eye out pretending that ANY of the other MSM outlets aren't equally bad or worse.
FWIW, I've stated on numerous occasions that you'll get far less biased reporting on domestic U.S. controversies by following British sources, than any of these bought and paid for U.S. outlets. They're deplorable.
Are you drunk? I said you can't accept us agreeing with you, like it's some sort of badge only you liberals can wear. I don't care what your party affiliation is. It can be the Unified Little Green Men party for all I care, you're still a liberal. At least so much as you present yourself on here. For all we know you're the president of the "I ♥ Sally Kern" fan club in real life, but on here you're a liberal. Why can't you just admit it? Are you ashamed? Not that I'd blame you if you were of course, I don't judge that way.
What frosts my nipples is when you and a select few get on here and beat your dead horse, then when we actually agree on something, you beat it harder and faster! Only a liberal could infuriate someone who agrees with them on something. Why can't you just accept it graciously? Is it just not in your nature? Sheesh...
