Also, with respect to comments about "consent" with regards (possibly) to that meme, perhaps one should go back and re-read that meme. To me, it didn't seem to imply that consent was even to be considered, but then, maybe I read it wrong instead.
i'm guessing there is a lot about our society and it's language that would be judged harshly. And i doubt our current topic would be the first in line for judgement.
But our language will continue to evolve (or devolve, if you must). And expression and form changes along with it.
What would Shakespeare thought of Jefferson's writings? What would Jefferson have thought of Faulkner (who, by the way, has a 1,288 word sentence in 'Absalom, Absalom!').
But i think the issues at play with this have more to do with how our society views and values education than it does how it views who gets to use what potty.
And i think you write very well. I noticed it right away. I disagree with many things you've said, but you do say it eloquently.
When the Jewish people established the nation of Israel, people came from all over the world. They spoke a wide variety of languages but they needed one in common. They chose Hebrew which pretty much fit all criteria of a dead language. It was used for prayer, ceremony, and study. Everybody knew it but nobody "spoke" it.
The old men noticed children in the street contracting some words, and abusing others creating slang, They said "You kids get off my language." They didn't realize that Hebrew was alive again, as it should be.
If you were to study the Bible more, you would realize that Christians MUST judge. Otherwise, how else would we know with whom it is that we don't want to associate.
Also, with respect to comments about "consent" with regards (possibly) to that meme, perhaps one should go back and re-read that meme. To me, it didn't seem to imply that consent was even to be considered, but then, maybe I read it wrong instead.
You put one in the -X- Ring with the remark on ‘Education’. In my opinion, it’s the crux of our nation’s dilemma. A lasting testament to Thomas Jefferson’s legacy, The Public Education System, was crippled by the influence of Progressivism. This philosophy reduced academics from the pursuit of excellence to the pursuit of the mundane.
“Our schools have been scientifically designed to prevent over education from happening. The average American (should be) content with their humble role in life, because they're not tempted to think about any other role.”
*U.S. Commissioner of Education, William T. Harris, 1889 , and
“Independent self-reliant people would be a counterproductive anachronism in the collective society of the future where people will be defined by their associations.”
**1896 John Dewey, educational philosopher, proponent of modern public schools.
“The children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society that is coming, where everyone would be interdependent.”
***John Dewey (1899)
The following paragraphs are my opinion based on my own independent research:
John Dewey- (Misguided Philosophical Pragmatist), Psychologist and Educator whose most beneficial contribution to humanity was to die.....but not before his influence successfully undermined the educational effectiveness of teachers and obscured the traditional purpose of education.
The political implications of his philosophical theories which viewed man as a ‘social creature by nature and that the values and rules by which society lives should serve the collective needs and wants rather than those of individuals.’
He postulated that the educational system was the most appropriate and effective environment for experimentation with social reform and for implementing social change. In effect, Dewey did his best to undermine learning as the basis and intent of education and instead redirected its purpose towards molding and conditioning youth to take their place in a future collective society. (cgh)
These two malignant Charlatans are revered by our leading academic authorities, ideologues and strategists who proudly continue their work in the pursuit of reducing our nation’s academic performance to render it as a more pliable population for control by a future Socialist Government.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh I don't doubt you feel that way. However, it's been relayed to me that the opposite is true, often quoting those verses I linked. Whom is correct? IF christians "MUST judge" then where's your constant outrage? Personally, I think it would be exhausting, but nonetheless it seems there's some cherry picking going on to fit a narrative.
Still though, the bible says NOT to judge in multiple ways through multiple verses, you... a man.... says to judge others?
LOL! How boring.Oh, and FYI, I am a MAN and my wife is a WOMAN. Nothing complicated, just a plain old male and female of couple of the heterosexual persuasion. We find that works for us. YMMV.
Enter your email address to join: