Ruger Fail

[kd5rjz]

Yeah, that's it. You're so clever.

Ruger Fail = Fail

Ruger doesn't make it. Who cares?

Clip vs. magazine complaint is worn out.

Then skip to the next thread?

No reason to argue just for sake of arguing lol.

 

[KOPBET]

No reason to argue just for sake of arguing lol.

It's not an argument. Facts are incontrovertable.

 

[kroberts2131]

Yeah I don't see the point of saying its a fail. Another company made a product for Ruger and they listed it on their website. Whats the big deal?

 

[kd5rjz]

It's alright guys, not everyone "gets" calculus either.

 

[hard_r]

I think it's funny. It says "clip loader" but its for magazines! Seriously how hard is that?

And the clip vs. magazine thing is "worn out"? So lets just go around calling things by another name then.

Car:

Rifle:

CLIP:

 

[kroberts2131]

It's alright guys, not everyone "gets" calculus either.

At least were in the same boat.......It should be "Crabtree Tool and Die Fail"

 

[kd5rjz]

At least were in the same boat.......It should be "Crabtree Tool and Die Fail"

Fair enough!

 

[MoBoost]

Clip: device that holds multiple rounds together as a unit.
Magazine: device that holds multiple rounds within the firearm.
Clips were used to load magazines.
Once magazines became detachable - clip and magazine became interchangeable.
For some reason in recent years it became "cool" to differentiate the two and ridicule those who don't.

 

[68mustang]

Honestly that wasn't the first thing that popped into my head between clip and magazine. I've been repremanded for calling a suppressor a silencer, I understand the need to call something by the correct name, but cut some slack lol.

 

[gillman7]

I thought it was funny. If you are going to introduce a product, you might want to use the correct term for the industry. Does it make it function differently? No. Does it make the manufacturer look uniformed, yes.