Ruger Gunsite Scout Rifle 223 Stainless

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
4,609
Reaction score
3,641
Location
Douglass, KS
www.ruger.com_products_gunsiteScoutRifle_images_6825.jpg


This is a rifle that I have had for over a year now and has had a few rounds through it, so I thought to give my impression of it.


The initial impression was a good one. It is based on the Ruger Model 77, thus is almost a classic Mauser action. The bolt is recessed on the face, and the action is a little rough but it is starting to smooth out as I work the bolt a few times. Trigger pull is good, and the rifle looks to be a very rugged and robust all-weather working gun as it is made of stainless steel. The stock is just like my GSR in 308, a many-layered laminate so it should nearly as resistant to the elements as the rest of the rifle.

The safety, which is different from the classic Mauser, is very positive and strong, blocking the firing pin by means of a metal pivot. It can only be engaged, like many other firearms, if the rifle is cocked. And just like the classic Mauser, it stops the bolt from rotating while on 'safe'. Just as with the safeties on other firearms, it is a mechanical device, thus there is the remote possibility that it can fail and it should not be relied upon.

If the rifle has a design flaw, it is, just like with the 308 GSR, the magazine. It loads like a pistol mag; i.e., from the front.

The rifle is a lot of fun to shoot, but that is hardly surprising, as most of them are fun to shoot.

First, a couple of negatives were noted , both of which I think were issues of the rifle being new, of not being broke in. The bolt tended to skip over rounds in the magazine. And the bolt was not as smooth as I'd like. Possibly the two are related and both will probably lessen as the rifle wears in.

It handles well, and the recoil was milder than I had expected--not that I was anticipating bad recoil.

Doing my standard barrel break-in was a bit of a chore, as the gun, being a Mauser action, had to be magazine-fed, and the magazine was a detachable box type. For the first five shots, the barrel was cleaned after each shot, using two patches with each shot, one a patch soaked in a good nitro-powder solvent and then a dry patch. Then two shots were fired between patches, and finally five shots and the remainder of the box. This necessitated taking the magazine out of the receiver, and loading the rounds in, one at a time. On the plus side the magazine seemed to be really easy to load, but I eagerly wait for Ruger to do the polymer mags for this one like they did for the 308 GSR. There, all I have to do was snap the rounds in the magazine with the bolt open.

Accuracy of the rifle is a bit hard to gauge with me, as I am a lousy rifle shot, but the very first shot went to within an inch of the 1" orange dot that I stuck on the cardboard silhouette target.

All-in-all, I think I'm going to like this rifle a lot. For those who prefer manually-operated arms like me, it would be a good SHTF gun, as it is rugged, compact and comes in a common, readily available caliber. The very mild recoil and the fact that ammunition for it is fairly inexpensive will encourage me to practice, and (hopefully) improve my rifle marksmanship. Perhaps I am being overly-optimistic here, but stranger things have happened.

As a matter of possible interest, it is designed to shoot both 5.56mm NATO and 223 Remington.
 

ldp4570

Sharpshooter
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
6,461
Reaction score
123
Location
McAlester
I had one of the GSR's in .308, and was very pleased with her. As to the .223/5.56 version I think they could have lightened the rifle some compared to the .308 version. Since there is no difference to the outer diameter of the barrel between the rounds you get a heavier barrel plus a heavier rifle. Ruger could have made design changes to lighten the .223 version. My opinion, but the .223 GSR is way to heavy for its caliber.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
4,609
Reaction score
3,641
Location
Douglass, KS
I had one of the GSR's in .308, and was very pleased with her. As to the .223/5.56 version I think they could have lightened the rifle some compared to the .308 version. Since there is no difference to the outer diameter of the barrel between the rounds you get a heavier barrel plus a heavier rifle. Ruger could have made design changes to lighten the .223 version. My opinion, but the .223 GSR is way to heavy for its caliber.
You have a valid thought there, but if I might, the weight of the barrel does not add all that much to carry and the GSR is a good shooter.

The thing I wish for the most is a different magazine. Soon after the GSR came out in 308, a polymer magazine came out that allowed loading the rifle from the top with the magazine in the rifle. This type of magazine is the major change that I want. The current magazine is a royal PITA to deal with and is a detraction from an otherwise fine rifle.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
4,609
Reaction score
3,641
Location
Douglass, KS
I agree the standard magazine sucks, and the GSR is a great shooter, but still to heavy for the .223/5.56.
The weight is a valid concern, but it doesn't bother me. I guess the positives , for me anyway, overcome the weight. Once I get the polymer magazines, it will likely be my favorite rifle. It is one of my favorites now.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
4,609
Reaction score
3,641
Location
Douglass, KS
How about emailing them about synthetic stocks for their left handed scout? I emailed customer service a few times and when i did get a responce it was a generic sorry we dont offer it right now email.
You sound as frustrated as I was about the magazines.

Getting any information out of them for this polymer magazine was about like pulling teeth. I was told a year ago (by Ruger) that the magazines would be available by late summer and when fall rolled around I got back on the shopruger site, and saw nothing on them. I waited for a couple of months and emailed them again with no response. Finally I called customer service (they said that they knew nothing about it) and they could do nothing except to forward my message on to the CEO. Finally, about a year later, I decided to give it another look and this time they were there and in stock. So, I ordered one. I hope it was worth the wait.
 

doctorjj

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
7,041
Reaction score
1,178
Location
Pryor
I don't get the tedious break in procedure when it hasn't ever been proven to be beneficial and you are a self admitted bad shot with a rifle. I'm also still trying to figure out why I'd want this rifle over a quality AR15. I see that it provides zero advantages.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom