Not flaming it, I just don't get it. Those specs perfectly describe an M4 variant.
Still not tracking the usefullness of the Scout concept as it is presented in this Ruger...given today's firearms options.
QUOTE]
Yes, but I didn't list requirement #1 which is the ability to take 400kg targets at 300m. Try that with an m4. You can do it with an AR 10 but you'll never come close to the ideal weight.
Here's a link to the complete requirements for the Scout from some devotees of the concept: http://www.scoutrifle.org/index.php?topic=24.0
I get what you're saying about the Scout in general, from reading comentary by Cooper I think he got that same question alot. His answer seems to boil down into two parts First is that it's a general purpose rifle. It avoids any specialization and places a heavy emphasis on handiness. Second, it is a RIFLE, which, in his view, is distinctly different from "Battle Carbine's" ie m4, and AK which to him have their own specialized role and too many limitations.
In other words, it's not supposed to be the only GUN you need it's supposed to be the only RIFLE you need.
As for it being a bolt action, this is not one of the "requirements", it is by default all Scouts have been bolt action to keep them somewhere near the ideal weight. Cooper wrote that semi auto's would make perfectly acceptable Scout rifles provided you could get a reliable down around the ideal weight, oh, yeah, and fire a cartridge capable of taking 400kg game at 300meters. Bolt action is not seen as a handicap at all by Cooper. In his perfectionist view the rifleman simply hits with his first shot. In the rare event that the first shot doesn't have the desired effect or there are multiple targets a rifleman should be perfectly capable of cycling the bolt while remaining on target with speed that rivals a semi auto. Since this level of skill is obviously the goal of every rifleman worthy of the title there is no reason to compromise the weight limit or the overall handiness of his "Scout" rifle.