And that's about 22.2%.
I seem to have missed something in this thread, can I get updated on how we will end up with a 22.2% increase?
And that's about 22.2%.
I seem to have missed something in this thread, can I get updated on how we will end up with a 22.2% increase?
Most beer is unpasteurized so that's not true. It's about controlling freshness and that it has to sit hot in the hands of 3 separate entities before you can buy it
Only part I care about is allowing breweries, especially local, put their beer in the hands of people who will treat it correctly. All the breweries I know of support this
And I honestly don't care about if your liquor store goes out of business because you won't specialize and you're the exact same as the 5 other liquor stores in a square mile. If my restaurant doesn't set itself apart it will go out of business so the same should be true of the liquor monopoly
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The distributor CAN store it cold, they just chose not to, which has nothing to do with the laws except it can't to be sold cold.
what is the point of storing it cold at the distributor if it's just going to get warm sitting on a shelf at the liquor store?
Not sure why you're asking this?
do you have a link to the law regarding unpasteurized beer? I looked but couldn't seem to find it.
Most beer that is pasteurized is some for stability of the product from what brewers have told me. Very little (if any) harmful bacteria can grow in the alcoholic environment (as many home brewers know).
The stability issue is what i was always told was the reason for some breweries not wanting to do business in OK. They didn't want to risk their product sitting hot on shelves. But this was awhile ago.
I didn't say there was a law regarding unpasteurized beer? What I said was, that it has to be sold hot....assuming everyone knows it's +3.2 beer? Therefore those beer makers won't ship their beer to our distributors.
Enter your email address to join: