I agree that someone can be condescending while being right.
My disagreement with his argument is that I consider a home to be adequately secure without further security inside locked doors and windows. Again, not ANTI-safe by any means
I guess that is where we part ways. I wouldn't consider a locked door and windows as adequate protection for firearms, or really much of anything. That relies on respect for private property to work, and I diont think we would have any safes at all if that were a universal truth.
It should be the case, but I havent seen it to be so.
Last edited: