That gets a little off topic, and draws some shaky associations in my mind. Especially the opening borders means they are complicit part. That's like saying gun manufacturers are responsible for murder victims. It follows the same logic.Well sadly, I have to admit that 27 lives lost is horrific, regardless of political stickers. However, that said, there is one political side which seems to no have as great a concern for human lives as another political side. Said first political side is the one that has abortion rights in its political platform and whose members in Congress have viewed abortion rights as a "litmus test" when looking at legislation and confirmation of officials and judges. Same political side that has advocated assisted suicide and some have even advocated for euthanasia for some "classes" of people.
With regards to abortion, the number of abortions since 1973 is over 60,000,000. Thus, that political side advocating for abortion rights is well within the realm of being inhumane, and puts the U.S. as a country that has "murdered" more people than Hitler and close to those "murdered" by Stalin and Mao Tse Tung.
Thus, if a political party is supportive of "opening the borders," that party is somewhat complicit in the deaths of people who risk everything to try to get to America for the good life. I don't necessarily blame the illegals as I do those that facilitate illegal entry into the U.S.
By contrast, that opposing political side would prefer that immigration always be through legal means.
I won't go down the abortion rabbit hole here. That would get way off topic and likely need to be in a different forum to get into that discussion. I seem to have a different viewpoint than you here.
Real question here --- can you explain what the right is doing to fix the homelessness problem that the left isn't? I don't personally see either side of the spectrum doing what I think they can.Exactly, that side cares more about illegals than they do homeless Americans.