Agreed. Anyone who thinks Holder would prosecute a federal employee for violating a restriction like that is a special kind of stupid.
Agreed. Anyone who thinks Holder would prosecute a federal employee for violating a restriction like that is a special kind of stupid.
I would also note for the Coburn "fans" out there NRA did NOT score this last cloture vote on the Motion to Proceed, because they knew it wasn't very important in the grand scheme. They will most likely score a cloture vote to end debate on the FINAL bill, which would actually be time to be worried.
Of course they are. It's not a position mons meg. It's a fact. Every one of them sold us out.
You can't possibly know their motivations. At any rate, it's over for the moment.
If we can't know them, it's because they refuse to disclose them. Regardless, I don't see much "transparency" from any of them these days, Coburn included.
I don't need to be a mind reader to recognize the outcome of their work. It's obvious for anyone to see.
If we can't know them, it's because they refuse to disclose them. Regardless, I don't see much "transparency" from any of them these days, Coburn included.
Several threads going on about this at once....but I haven't gotten a response to an open question I posted earlier: Is Jeff Flake (R-AZ) a sellout, too? He voted for cloture.
Also, enough frownie faces from you, young man...
"America's Most Aggressive Defender of Firearms Ownership"
There ya go!!
Are you frowning about my frownie faces? 
As for Flake, is he authoring an amendment to ressurect the now dead background check changes like Coburn? I'd say he was playing just as fast and loose as Coburn BTW.
Similar threads
