So, who’s saying election fraud is acceptable? So far, I’ve only seen anyone say that there’s not evidence of enough of it to swing the election, which is far from the same thing as saying it’s acceptable.
You are missing the big picture. ANY election involving fraud is enough to "sway" any election. Such an election has no validity. I'm not saying the party that didn't commit any fraud should automatically win, however. Either a new fool-proof election must be conducted under strict scrutiny(paper ballots, many observers) or the legislature of the state should assign electors.
Woody